SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BISWANATH RATH
Giridhari Agarwalla – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Pal
For the Respondent: S. Mishra

Table of Content
1. prayer for writ of mandamus/certiorari. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding authority for land conversion. (Para 3)
3. court's decision to interfere with prior order. (Para 4)
4. timeline for action from respective authorities. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER :

2. The Writ Petition involves the following prayer:-

Further, direct the opp. Party no.4 to restore the Mutation Case No.1294 of 2022 filed under Section 8(A) of the O.L.R. Act and convert the same as an application under Rule 34(e) of the O.S.S. Rules, 1962 and further direct the Tahasildar, Boudh to refer the said application for conversion of the land into “Gharabai” by the Collector, Boudh, who may be further directed to refer the matter to Jalasaya Committee constituted under the Chairmanship of R.D.C. Berhampur as per the standing instructions of the Government of Odisha;

Pass such other further order/orders as deems just and proper;

And for which act of kindness, the petitioner, as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”

4. Considering the rival contentions of the Parties and looking to the nature of direction in disposal of W.P.(C) No.8797 of 2004 along with O.J.C. No.6721 of 1999 disposed of on 11.10.2012, the matter should have

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top