SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BISWANATH RATH
Giridhari Agarwalla – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Pal
For the Respondent: S. Mishra

Table of Content
1. prayer for writ of mandamus/certiorari. (Para 2)
2. arguments regarding authority for land conversion. (Para 3)
3. court's decision to interfere with prior order. (Para 4)
4. timeline for action from respective authorities. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

2. The Writ Petition involves the following prayer:-

“It is therefore, most humbly prayed that taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi in the nature of writ of Mandamus/Certiorari calling upon the opp. Parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 12.08.2022 passed by the opp. Party no.4 -Tahasildar, Boudh under Annexure-3 series shall not be quashed/set aside;

Further, direct the opp. Party no.4 to restore the Mutation Case No.1294 of 2022 filed under Section 8(A) of the O.L.R. Act and convert the same as an application under Rule 34(e) of the O.S.S. Rules, 1962 and further direct the Tahasildar, Boudh to refer the said application for conversion of the land into “Gharabai” by the Collector, Boudh, who may be further directed to refer the matter to Jalasaya Committee constituted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top