Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Pradip Kumar Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to Govt., School and Mass Education Deptt. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to compassionate appointment after death of employee. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. delay in compassionate appointment unjustified; need for prompt action. (Para 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes timely actions for compassionate appointments. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court directs adherence to rehabilitation assistance rules. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. petitions allowed; directive to appoint petitioners accordingly. (Para 12) |
ORDER :
S.K. PANIGRAHI, J.
1. Both the matters are taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties-State.
3. The petitioners have filed these applications challenging the order dated 23.03.2021 of the District Education Officer, Kendrupara- Opp. Party No.4 in rejecting their representations for compassionate appointment under the prevailing Rule when the petitioners had submitted their application pursuant to the order of the High Court for considering their case in the light of the judgment reported in 2015 (11) ILR-CUT-569. The petitioners have also challenged the action of the Opp. Parties in not considering their case for appointment under Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme as per the Orissa Civil Service
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
