Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Ridhi Sidhi Trade and Services Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against lower court's decree. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiffs' claim on land ownership. (Para 3) |
| 3. trial court dismissed suit; appeal led to reversal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments on possession and validity of sale-deed. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. unregistered sale document alone insufficient for title. (Para 8) |
| 6. appeal allowed; original ruling restored. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
1. These Appellant, in filing this Appeal under section-100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (for short ‘the Code’), assails the judgment and decree dated 01.02.2018 & 13.02.2018 respectively passed by the learned First Additional District Judge, Rourkela in RFA No. 26 of 2016.
2. For the sake of convenience, in order to avoid confusion and bring in clarity, the parties hereinafter have been referred to, as they have been arraigned in the Suit.
The Defendant did not file any written statement.
The Plaintiffs thus being non-suited carried the First appeal. The First Appellate Court after hearing and on going through the evidence on record has set aside the order of dismissal of the suit passed by the Trial Court and decreed the same as stated above.
Whether on the basis of an unregistered sale document, the tit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
