Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Ridhi Sidhi Trade and Services Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against lower court's decree. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiffs' claim on land ownership. (Para 3) |
| 3. trial court dismissed suit; appeal led to reversal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments on possession and validity of sale-deed. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. unregistered sale document alone insufficient for title. (Para 8) |
| 6. appeal allowed; original ruling restored. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
D. DASH, J.
1. These Appellant, in filing this Appeal under section-100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (for short ‘the Code’), assails the judgment and decree dated 01.02.2018 & 13.02.2018 respectively passed by the learned First Additional District Judge, Rourkela in RFA No. 26 of 2016.
By the same, the Appeal filed by the unsuccessful Plaintiff in Civil Suit No.27 of 2015 of the learned Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rourkela under section-96 of the Code has been allowed. The Trial Court having dismissed the suit filed by the Respondents (Plaintiffs), the First Appellate Court has decreed the suit declaring that the Plaintiffs have the right, title, interest and possession over the suit land and confirmed their possession in further holding that the registered sale-deed dated 13.10.2009
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
