SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ori) 568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Babuli @ Jhadeswar Jena – Appellant
Versus
Upendra Nath Beshra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Pravash Ch. Jena, S.J. Das, A. Das, B.S. Mishra, A. Singh

Table of Content
1. plaintiff's claim regarding land title. (Para 1 , 3)
2. defendant's assertion of ownership. (Para 4)
3. trial court's findings on evidence. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
4. court's analysis of title transfer. (Para 7 , 9)
5. dismissal of the appeal. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT :

1. The Appellant, by filing this Appeal, under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the Code’), has assailed the judgment and decree dated 01.03.2016 & 11.03.2016 respectively passed by the learned District Judge, Mayurbhanj, Baripada in R.F.A. No.1 of 2014.

2. For the sake of convenience, in order to avoid confusion and bring in clarity, the parties hereinafter have been referred to, as they have been arraigned in the Suit.

4. The Defendant, in his written statement, while traversing the plaint averments has asserted to have purchased the suit land from the plaintiff on payment of full consideration which was agreed at Rs.5000/-. It was stated that after the Plaintiff sold the suit land to Defendant, he made an application for mutation of the suit land in his favour and the Plaintiff then had never objected to the same. It is stated that the Plaintiff has no further right, title and interest ov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top