SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA, J.
Biswambara Kanhar and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
CRLREV No. 36 of 2022
Decided On : 20-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Amitav Tripathy, S.L. Pattnaik, M. Pagal, A.R. Behera
For the Respondent: P.C. Das

The right to default bail under Section 167(2) accrues if the charge-sheet is not filed within 180 days, and the trial court must inform the accused of this right per procedural safeguards.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 167(2) - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 36 A(4) - Default bail - Petitioners denied default bail due to the late filing of a charge-sheet after 180 days - Court held that petitioners had an indefeasible right to default bail following the expiry of the statutory period and the failure of the prosecution to extend this period. (Paras 3, 10, 11, 20)

(B) Duty of Court - The trial court must inform the accused of their right to default bail when it accrues, ensuring compliance with procedural safeguards under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which protects the right to life and liberty. (Paras 12, 20)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners arrested on 21.12.2021 for possession of 11 quintals of ganja and sought default bail under Section 167(2) after 180 days without a charge-sheet filed by 20.08.2021.

Findings of Court:
The impugned order rejecting default bail was set aside, with the court emphasizing procedural rights of the accused.

Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to default bail due to non-filing of charge-sheet within the stipulated time and failure of the court to notify their rights.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the right to default bail accrues upon the lapse of the statutory period without extension granted, which the trial court failed to recognize.

Result: Criminal revision allowed.

Table of Content
1. criminal revision against denial of default bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's duty to inform accused of bail rights. (Para 3 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. petitioners contend right to default bail after 180 days. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10)
4. accused’s right to default bail can be denied post filing charge-sheet. (Para 18 , 19)
5. impugned order set aside; default bail granted. (Para 20)
6. order for petitioners' release on default bail. (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

A.K. MOHAPATRA, J.

1. The present criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 12.01.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, Phulbani in C.T. Case No.19 of 2021 arising out of Phiringia P.S. Case No.23 of 2021 thereby rejecting the prayer for default bail of the petitioners under the provisions of Section 167 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

2. The prosecution story, as unfolded from the F.I.R. bereft of unnecessary details, is that the present petitioners along with others were arrested in the above noted P.S. case for the offence under Section 20 (b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act and as such, they are in judicial custody since 21.12.2021. It is alleged that on 20.02.2021 at about 4.10 A.M., IIC Phiringia Police Station received credible information that many persons are in possession of contraband Ganja i.e. flowering and fruiting tops of cannabis plants in 23 numbers of plastic bags are waiting in a lonely place i.e. beside the road at village Melupada under a mango tree and in front of the house of one Ratnakar Kanhar for transportation. As per the direction of IIC, Phiringia Police Station, S.I. of police along with other police party members proceeded to the spot and found that four persons were sitting on the plastic bags and some of them were standing nearby. On seeing the police party, the accused persons tried to flee away from the spot. However, the police team caught hold of four accused persons at the spot. On being asked, they disclosed their names which also includes the present petitioner and further upon search it was found that plastic bags were containing 11 quintals of contraband ganja. The contraband articles were seized from the spot and the accused persons were arrested and forwarded in the present case.

3. In view of the provisions contained in Section 167 (2) as well as in Section 36 -A(4) of the N.D.P.S. Act, charge-sheet should have been filed within 180 days from the date of remand of the present petitioners as the offence alleged involves more than commercial quantity of contraband substances. Therefore, taking into consideration the aforesaid 180 days period, the charge-sheet should been filed on or before 20.08.2021 Further, it is made clear that in the event charge-sheet is not filed within the aforesaid 180 days period, then the Investigating Officer should have approached the Special court by filing an application for extension of the period for filing the final form in the matter and in such eventuality the Special court under the proviso of -A(4) of the NDPS Act is competent to extend the period for filing final form up to one year on the report of the Public Prosecutor intimating the progress of the investigation and by assigning specific reasons for detaining all the accused beyond the period of 180 days.

4. Heard Mr. A. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. P.C. Das, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the case diary as well as materials available on record.

5. It is submitted by Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioners, that the petitioners were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.02.2021 and that the charge-sheet should have been filed within 180 days i.e. on or before 20.08.2021. it is further submitted that the Investigating Officer has failed to file the charge-sheet within the aforesaid stipulated period of time. Further no application as provided in the proviso to Section 36 A (4) of the N.D.P.S. Act was present to the said court for extension of time to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top