SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 226

B. K. SHRIVASTAVA
Raja Bhaiya Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Shreyas Pandit for applicant; Sanjeev Kumar Singh,
Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision has been preferred on 24.7.2020 by applicant Raja Bhaiya Singh against the order dated 25.4.2020 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS, Panna, District Panna in connection with Crime No.270/2019, registered at Police Station Simariya, District Panna under section 8/20 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”).

2. By the impugned order the learned trial Court dismissed the application filed under section 167(2) of CrPC on behalf of accused for default bail upon the ground that challan has not been filed within 60 days from the arrest of accused/applicant.

3. It appears from the record that the petitioner was arrested on 13.2.2020 and on the same date he was produced before the concerned Court, by which he was sent to judicial custody. The applicant moved an application under section 167(2) of CrPC on 21.4.2020 and the challan was also filed by the police on the same date. It appears from the impugned order that the trial Court received the aforesaid application for default bail on 2:32 p.m. through whatsapp message upon the personal mobile number of concerned judicial officer (as per Circular No.P-33 dated 20.4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top