SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R.MOHAPATRA
Sunanda Kar @ Rath – Appellant
Versus
Sudip Rath – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Maheswar Mohanty, Advocate

Table of Content
1. overview of execution case and jurisdiction issues. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner's argument on family court's jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court’s analysis on jurisdiction of family court for execution. (Para 7)
4. court finds no jurisdiction for civil judge after family court establishment. (Para 8)
5. order issued to set aside previous ruling and enforce jurisdiction. (Para 9)

ORDER :

K.R. MOHAPATRA, J.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner in this writ petition seeks to assail the order dated 15th December, 2021 (Annexure-7) passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Puri in Execution Case No.16 of 2009, sending back the case record to the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Puri to adjudicate the execution proceeding holding that since Family Court at Puri was not in existence on the date of filing of the execution case, the provision of Section 8 (c) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (for convenience, ‘the Act’) would not be attracted.

3. Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel submits that the Opposite Party filed MAT Case No.227 of 2002 before learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Puri for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top