Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SAVITRI RATHO
Ulaka Raisulu – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction based on seizure of illicit liquor. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. assessment of witness credibility and evidence. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. challenges to conviction based on evidential issues. (Para 7) |
| 4. requirement for chemical analysis in alcohol seizures. (Para 8) |
| 5. result of revision and discharge of bail. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Ulaka Raisulu has filed this Criminal Revision challenging the judgment and order dated 17.08.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rayagada in Criminal Appeal No. 39 of 2004 confirming the judgment passed by learned S.D.J.M., Gunupur in 2(a) C.C. Case No. 36 of 2001/ T.R. Case No. 125 of 2001, convicting him for commission of the offence under Section 47 (a) of the Bihar and Orissa Excise Act and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default to undergo R.I. for six months, subject to set off.
3. In order to prove its case, prosecution has examined three witnesses. P.W.1 Santosh Kumar Sethi is the Excise Constable, P.W.2 Narayana Bisoi is the S.I. of Excise and P.W.3 Padmanava Behera is an independent witness. The defence did not examine any witness.
P.W. 2-Narayana Bisoi, who i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
