SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 824

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA
Bramhananda Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. T.K. Pattanaik

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request and background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. opposite parties' position on fee refund. (Para 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. court's reasoning on fee refund legality. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
4. court's directive for fee refund. (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Mohapatra, J. :

1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking refund of the course fee along with accrued interest.

2. The petitioner, who is the young boy aged about 17 years in the present writ petition through his father guardian, has approached this Court by filing the above noted writ application with a prayer for a direction to the Opposite Parties to refund Course Fee along with interest, which has been deposited by the petitioner at the time of taking admission into Opposite Party Educational Institution. After taking admission, he did not continue study in the institution.

3. The factual matrix, in a nutshell, is that the petitioner on being duly selected to take admission into B.Sc. Information Technology and Management (ITM) course imparted by Revenshaw University, Cuttack for the academic session 2014-15 took admission on 12.07.2014 and was accordingly assigned the Rol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top