IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Alok Aradhe, M.G.S.Kamal, JJ.
Dr. Vaibhav Khosla - Appellant
Versus
The State of Karnataka & Ors. - Respondents
W.P. No.30619 of 2018 (Edn-Med-Adm)
Decided On : 27-01-2022
mandamus - return of original documents and refund of fee - ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS', (2003) 6 SCC 697
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to return original documents and refund the fee deposited for a MD Psychiatry course. The petitioner surrendered the seat before the last date of counseling and another round of counseling was held after the surrender.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent had no right in law to demand the remaining course fee of three years from the petitioner as per the law laid down in ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION AND ANOTHER. The original documents have been returned to the petitioner and the petitioner has given up the right to seek a refund of the deposited fee.
Issues: The main issue was whether the respondent had the right to demand the remaining course fee from the petitioner after the petitioner surrendered the seat before the last date of counseling.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principle established in ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION AND ANOTHER, which stated that an educational institution can only charge prescribed fees for one semester/year and has no right to demand the remaining course fee if the student surrenders the seat before the last date of counseling.
Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in terms indicated above.
ORDER
1. In this writ petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a writ of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5 to return the original documents submitted by the petitioner to Karnataka Examination Authority at the time of issuance of order of admission dated 16.05.2018 as well as a direction to respondent No.5 not to insist on payment of tuition fee of Rs.25,32,000/- for the entire duration of three years of MD Psychiatry course. The petitioner also seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Karnataka Examination Authority and respondent No.5 to refund the fee of Rs.7,74,500/-deposited by the petitioner at the time of admission to the aforesaid course on 16.05.2018.
2. Facts leading to filing of this petition, briefly stated are that the petitioner completed the MBBS course from Government Medical College, Amritsar in the State of Punjab and has been conferred the medical degree by the Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Punjab. The petitioner appeared in the Post Graduate National eligibility cum Entrance Test, 2018. The petitioner was registered with Karnataka Examination Authority which is designated authority for conducting counseling for admission to P.G. Medical Courses in the State of Karnataka. The petitioner was not allotted any seat in the first and second round of counseling conducted by the Karnataka Examination Authority. The petitioner had also applied for admission to P.G.Medical Course in Baba Farid University of Health Sciences, Punjab. The candidature of the petitioner was not considered for admission. Therefore, he filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana for a direction to the University to consider his case for admission to PG Medical course as per his ranking in P.G.NEET Examination, 2018.
3. In pursuance to the direction issued by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the petitioner was granted admission in Christian Medical College, Ludhiana in M.S.Orthopedics and was admitted to the course on 24.05.2018. The petitioner had also participated in the mop up round and counseling conducted by the Karnataka Examination Authority on 16.05.2018 and was allotted a seat in M.D.Psychiatry course in the college run by respondent No.5. The petitioner thereupon deposited a sum of Rs.7,74,500/- as well as all his original documents with Karnataka Examination Authority. However, subsequently, when the petitioner was admitted in the Christian Medical College, Ludhiana in MS Orthopedics Course, the petitioner immediately informed the Karnataka Examination Authority as well as the respondent No.5-College by an e-mail dated 29.05.2018 that he is surrendering his seat in MD Psychiatry Course in respondent No.5-Medical College. It is pertinent to note that the last date for counseling to the PG Course was 31.05.2018. The petitioner, thereafter, visited Bangalore and submitted a communication to respondent No.2 stating that he is surrendering the seat and requested for handing over the original documents. The petitioner, thereafter, submitted a representation on 28.05.2018.
4. It is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner had surrendered his seat immediately prior to the last date of counseling and much before commencing of the Course. After the petitioner had surrendered the seat, the Karnataka Examination Authority had conducted another round of counseling on 30.05.2018. The respondent No.5 thereafter sent a communication dated 03.06.2018 to the petitioner to deposit a sum of R.25,32,000/-. In the aforesaid obtaining factual matrix, the petitioner has approached this court seeking the reliefs as stated supra.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner while inviting the attention of this court by an interim order dated 24.04.2019 passed by Division Bench of this court fairly stated that in compliance of the aforesaid order, the original documents have already been returned to the petitioner and the petitioner has already given up the relief of refund of Rs.7,74,500/- which was deposited by the
Islamic Academy Of Education And Another Vs. State Of Karnataka And Others
AI
An educational institution can only charge prescribed fees for one semester/year and has no right to demand the remaining course fee if the student surrenders the seat before the last date of counsel....
Withholding original academic qualification certificates by the college is impermissible in law.
Educational institutions must adhere to guidelines on tuition refunds while considering individual circumstances.
Educational institutions cannot impose non-refundable fees if students do not attend classes, as it contradicts principles of fairness and non-profit operation.
Retention of original certificates as security for payment must be supported by the terms and conditions of admission and lawful authority, and cannot be sustained without proper legal basis.
Educational institutions cannot retain students' original documents to compel fee payment, as such action lacks legal authority.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.