Bali Bhotra vs Sondhar Banua @ Bhotra (Since Dead) by his LRs

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Bali Bhotra – Appellant
Versus
Sondhar Banua @ Bhotra (Since Dead) by his LRs – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.Manoj Mishra
For the Respondent: Mr.B.Rout

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background regarding the adoption claim. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. trial court's findings on the adoption status. (Para 6)
4. substantial questions of law posed by the appeal. (Para 7)
5. arguments presented by the appellant and respondents. (Para 8 , 9)
6. court review of evidence and previous judgments. (Para 10 , 11)
7. legal requirements for valid adoption and ruling reasons. (Para 12 , 13)
8. final ruling and conclusion of the case. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

1. The Appellant, in this Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the Code’), has assailed the judgment and decree 28.07.2000 and 09.08.2000 respectively passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jeypore in T.A. No.3 of 1995.

Be it stated here that the original Respondent No.1 (Plaintiff), having died during pendency of the suit, his legal representatives have come on record on being substituted and they are the Respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(b).

3. Plaintiff’s Case:-

4. It is stated that the land in suit exclusively belonged to one Sanadhara Banua @ Bhotra. Said Sanadhara died eleven to twelve years before the institution

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACKD.DASHBali Bhotra – AppellantVersusSondhar Banua @ Bhotra (Since Dead) by his LRs – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Bali Bhotra – Appellant
Versus
Sondhar Banua @ Bhotra (Since Dead) by his LRs – Respondent