Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.MURALIDHAR, A.K.MOHAPATRA
Bachana Kumari Dei – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial procedure and handling of records (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. context of tenancy and land history (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. legal proceedings timeline and jurisdiction (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments against delay in proceedings (Para 12 , 13 , 19) |
| 5. jurisdiction and scope of action under o.e.a. act (Para 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 6. interpretation of statutory powers (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. comparison with prior case law (Para 23 , 24 , 26) |
| 8. fraud prevention in contractual obligations (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. legal standing of tenancy claims (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 10. record-keeping requirements for tenancy (Para 37 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. assessment and authority in tenancy rights (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 12. conclusion on case merits and order issuance (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 48) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The present writ petition has been filed questioning the legality, validity and propriety of order dated 26th April, 2008 passed in O.E.A. Revision No.52 of 1999 (Annexure-7) by the learned Member, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack where under order dated 14th November, 1979 (Annexure-1) passed by the O.E.A. Collector-cum-Tahasildar, Kujanga in O.E.A. Misc. Case No.15 of 1979 has been set aside by the learn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
