Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
V.NARASINGH
Bhagirathi Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Odisha State Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's retirement and grievances (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. history of previous petitions (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. challenge to the legality of actions post-retirement (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. citing relevant judicial precedents (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. continuance of departmental proceedings post-retirement (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. lack of authority to continue proceedings post-retirement (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 7. quashing of impugned orders (Para 19) |
| 8. legitimacy of retiral benefits and entitlement to interest (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. directive for payment of retirement benefits (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner working as Senior Sales Manager-cum-Godown Supervisor of the Opposite Party-Odisha State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited (herein after referred to as Corporation) retired on superannuation w.e.f. 30.11.2011 at Annexure-1.
3. It is apt to state here that this is the 4th journey of the petitioner to this court.
B. Petitioner challenged the order of punishment dtd.04.04.2015(Annexed as Annexure-7) in departmental proceeding on the ground that the proceedings cannot continue after retirement, in W.P.(C) No.8338 of 2015. This Court directed the petitioner to prefer appeal.
C. In WP(C) No.2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
