Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Rabinarayan Nanda – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the order of cognizance. (Para 1) |
| 2. claim of illegality due to lack of sanction. (Para 2) |
| 3. details of the alleged incident. (Para 3) |
| 4. court proceedings and history. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. argument regarding necessity of sanction. (Para 6) |
| 6. reference to f.i.r. related to incident. (Para 7) |
| 7. discussion on necessity of sanction under section 197. (Para 8) |
| 8. criteria for public servant’s protection. (Para 9) |
| 9. finding of necessity of sanction in current case. (Para 10) |
| 10. conclusion to set aside the order of cognizance. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
R.K. PATTANAIK, J.
1. Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioner assailing the order of cognizance dated 8th October, 2005 (Annexure-2) passed in I.C.C. Case No.39 of 2011 by the learned J.M.F.C., Bhuban on the ground that the same is illegal, perverse and without any sanction being obtained in terms of Section 197 Cr.P.C. and therefore, it is liable to be interfered with and set aside.
2. As per the petitioner, the learned court below took cognizance of offences under Sections 294 /325/326/342 and 506 IPC under Annexure-2 in a mechanical manner without application of judicial mind to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
