Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Suptimayee Acharya – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks admission and relief. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's qualifications and examination results. (Para 2) |
| 3. criteria for petitioner's eligibility and document discrepancies. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments from both parties heard. (Para 6) |
| 5. counsel arguments regarding document submission. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. analysis of eligibility criteria and requirements. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. court's observations on candidate rights and merit. (Para 11 , 13) |
| 8. potential equivalence verification for qualifications. (Para 12) |
| 9. court's directive for appointment consideration. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition seeking the following relief:-
And further directed to republish the merit list and incorporating the name of the petitioner.
And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall every pray.”
3. Counter affidavit is filed by the District Education Officer (opposite party no. 3). It is stated that the petitioner’s candidature was rejected on the ground of mismatch of her name in B.Ed. and B.A. certificates and for want of NCTE certificate. Since the requirement is for the candidate to produce certificate of the equivalence and the certifi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
