Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Suptimayee Acharya – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks admission and relief. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner's qualifications and examination results. (Para 2) |
| 3. criteria for petitioner's eligibility and document discrepancies. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments from both parties heard. (Para 6) |
| 5. counsel arguments regarding document submission. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. analysis of eligibility criteria and requirements. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. court's observations on candidate rights and merit. (Para 11 , 13) |
| 8. potential equivalence verification for qualifications. (Para 12) |
| 9. court's directive for appointment consideration. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT :
SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the writ petition seeking the following relief:-
“It is, therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ Petition, issue notice to Opp. Parties and thereby directing to file a show cause and if no show cause is filed/or insufficient cause has been shown and after hearing from both parties, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of certiorari/mandamus or any other suitable forms thereby quashing Letter No.4A-02- 2019-II, 4223, dt.25.10.2019 under Annexure-9 for the interest of justice.
A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
