JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Shalin Mehta with learned Advocate Ms. Aditi Raol with learned Advocate Ms. Shikha Panchal for the petitioner and learned Senior Advocate Mr. Devang Vyas with learned Advocate Mr. Rituraj M. Meena for the respondents.

2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought for the following prayers :

"24.(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action on the part of the respondent authorities in not assigning 5 marks to the petitioner in spite of him possessing the certificate of proficiency issued by the Ministry of HRD as per Clause 6.4 (1) and (3) of the advertisement no. 01/2019 as bad in law, arbitrary, unreasonable, irrational and thus violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and quashing and setting aside the same;

(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent authorities to grant the petitioner 5 additional marks to the petitioner for possessing the certificate of proficiency issued by the Ministry of HRD as per Clause 6.4 (1) and (3)