Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Alekha Swain – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for quashing criminal proceedings. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on compromise and non-compoundable offences. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning on quashing proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion and order to quash. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is at the behest of the petitioners for quashing of the criminal proceeding in connection with G.R. Case No.1667 of 2020 pending in the file of learned S.D.J.M., Kendrapara which corresponds to Marsaghai P.S. Case No.279 of 2020 on the ground of compromise between the parties.
3. Heard Mr. M. Chand, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. M. Mishra, learned ASC for the State and Mr. R.R. Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party No.2, namely, the informant.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the meantime, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. It is submitted by Mr. Chand, learned counsel for the petitioners that opposite party No.2 as well as the father of the deceased have filed affidavits in support of the alleged compromise which are on record. According to Mr. Chand, the affidavits have been filed without any inducement or com
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
