Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Rinarani Behuria – Appellant
Versus
Sumant Barik – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim application based on motor accident facts. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdictional issues. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's assessment of appeal viability. (Para 6) |
| 4. directions for tribunal's next steps. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER :
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
3. The present appeal has been filed inter alia challenging the judgment dated 16.12.2022 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge-cum-3rd M.A.C.T., Jharsuguda in MAC Case No. 43 of 2020. By the said judgment, the Tribunal refused to entertain the claim application and returned the same to the appellants on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.
4.1. It is contended that even though there is no bar for making such an application before the Tribunal in question, but on the ground that the accident had taken place in an area which does not come within the jurisdiction of Tribunal in question, claim application of the appellants was not entertained with passing of the impugned judgment.
“166. Application for compensation. –
(2) Every application under sub-section (1) shall be made, at the option of the claimant, either to the Claims Tribunal having jurisdiction over the a
The jurisdiction of the Claims Tribunal extends beyond technical territorial limits, provided that no failure of justice occurs, allowing compensation claims even if they arise outside traditional ju....
The interpretation of territorial jurisdiction under the Motor Vehicles Act should consider the presence of the insurer's office within the jurisdiction, and the Act should be interpreted in a manner....
The central legal point established is that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to hear a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is determined by the residence of the claimant and the locatio....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of Section 166(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act should be interpreted in a manner consistent with facilitating remedies for the ....
The court established that claim petitions under the Motor Vehicles Act can be filed in jurisdictions where the insurer has a business presence, promoting access to justice for claimants.
The jurisdiction of the Tribunal to deal with the claim petition and the sustainability of the impugned award.
(1) Territorial jurisdiction of Court – Lack of territorial jurisdiction by itself is not recognized under it as a reason to make a judgment/decree a nullity – It is quite different and distinct from....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in the district where the accident occurred or where the claimant resides has jurisdiction to entertain t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
