SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 350

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI, ACJ, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
Pittu Raja Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 21250 of 2022
Decided On : 01-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Prafulla Kumar Rath, S.K. Behera
For the Respondents: Prabhu Prasad Mohanty, Arun Kumar Patra

The State Government cannot relax excise policy restrictions on shifting liquor shops outside designated areas, as it contravenes established law requiring public notification.

Headnote:(A) Odisha Excise Act, 2008 - Sections 90 and 91 - Relaxation of Clause-4.2.14 (IV) of the Odisha Excise Policy for the year 2022-23 - Shifting of liquor shop from one excise area to another prohibited; relaxation impermissible under the governing law - The State Government lacks power to relax excise policies as per Sections 90 and 91, which necessitate public notification of all rules - The Excise Commissioner’s approval for shifting is unjustified under the existing policy framework. (Paras 1 to 15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a licensee of a country liquor shop, objected to the shifting of another nearby shop, which was approved without considering objections and violating excise regulations. Opposite party’s license for the Nirakarpur Country Liquor Shop was set to shift to a new location beyond the excise station area, leading to the petitioner filing a writ to challenge the approval.

Findings of Court:
The orders for shifting lacked proper authority and violated the governing policy, necessitating legal quashing.

Issues: The primary issue is whether the State Government can relax excise policy restrictions on shop shifting outside excise station areas.

Ratio Decidendi: The court articulated that any relaxation by the State regarding the excise policy must conform to Section 91 requirements, emphasizing adherence to set policies which do not permit such shifting.

Result: The writ petition is allowed, quashing the approval for the shop's shifting.

Table of Content
1. factual background of license and objections. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding legality of the shifting order. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's analysis on policy relaxation and statutory adherence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. quashing of orders due to violation of policy. (Para 13)
5. conclusion and final order allowing the writ petition. (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

B.R. SARANGI, ACJ.

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 30.06.2022 (Annexure-2) passed by the Under Secretary to Government of Odisha in Excise Department whereby shifting of Nirakarpur Country Liquor Shop from its existing site to a new site i.e., Plot No.1205, Khata No.506/73, Mouza-Baradiha, P.S-Tangi in the District of Khordha for the remaining period of the year 2022-23 has been approved by relaxing the restrictive Clause-4.2.14 (IV) of the Odisha Excise Policy for the year 2022-23.

2. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner is the licensee in respect of Chhotaraypur Country Liquor Shop in the District of Khordha. The petitioner was selected in the lottery and got the license, pursuant to which he has been operating the shop by following due procedure of law and by lifting the MGQ and paying duty to the Government. Opposite party no.5 was also a lottery winner and consequently became licence holder in respect of Nirakarpur Country Liquor Shop. She got licence for the year 2021-22. After getting the licence in respect of Nirakarpur Country Liquor Shop, she opened the shop in Mouza-Nanapada, Khata No.745/1125, Plot No.1331/3409 in the District of Khordha. Her licence was also renewed for the year 2022-23. Thereafter, opposite party no.5 applied for shifting of her shop to Mouza-Taladihi, Khata No.190/252, Plot No.830 and subsequently, Form-VIII notice was issued. The petitioner being a nearby licensee, objected to the same and file objection pursuant to Form-VIII notice. The petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.23759 of 2021 which was disposed of vide order dated 16.08.2021 directing the Excise Commissioner to consider the petitioner’s objection and also pass a final order. The Collector, Khordha though had issued Form-VIII notice vide order dated 22.07.2021, passed an order directing the petitioner to find out another site. Opposite party no.5 consequent thereupon applied for shifting of the shop to a location outside the excise station area which is 32Kms away from her original location. Opposite party no.5 suggested shifting of the shop to Mouza-Baradihi, Khata No.506/73, Plot No.1205, PS-Tangi, District-Khordha. The Collector, Khordha vide order dated 14.04.2022 did not recommend the case to the Excise Commissioner on the ground of distance from the proposed location. Thereafter, opposite party no.5 filed an appeal i.e. Excise Appeal Case No.11 of 2022 before the Excise Commissioner, Odisha without impleading the petitioner as a party. The place to which opposite party no.5 seeks shifting is beyond the excise station area and 32KMs away from the earlier location and nearer to the petitioner’s country liquor shop than the earlier one. The Excise Commissioner, however, without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, who has been objecting the shifting of the shop, allowed the appeal and set aside the order dated 14.04.2022 passed by the Collector, Khordha and directed the Collector, Khordha to invite public objection in prescribed Form-VIII and report to the Excise Directorate after consideration of the objections received against the proposal. Pursuant to such appellate order, the formalities about Form-VIII notice were stated to be complied with. An inquiry has also been conducted and an inquiry report dated 05.01.2022 was submitted by the Inspector of Excise stating that the distance of the proposed location is 32KMs away from the existing location and secondly, it is beyond excise station area. The Collector, Khurda also reported the prohibition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top