Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.RADHA RANI
Sri Sai Srinivas Wines – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
G. RADHA RANI, J.
This Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer:
“This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue any order or direction writ or writs more particularly on in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the Memo No. 6390/Excise – II(i)/2024 dated 15.02.2025 by setting aside the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 20.02.2024 and directing the 5th respondent to implement the orders of the 1st respondent, is arbitrary, illegal and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, set aside the same and further direct the 5th respondent to remove the lock on the on the shop of the petitioner bearing Premises No.4-100/78, Lakshmidevipally Village, Sarangapur Mandal, Jagtial District pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard Sri L.Ravi Chander, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri D.Y.N.L.N.Charyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5, and Sri B.Mallesh Yadav, learned counsel appearing fo
The authority granting permission for shifting a licensed premises must provide valid reasons, and failure to do so allows for revisionary intervention by a higher authority.
The consent of the owner of the premises is necessary for carrying on liquor business, and in the absence of such consent, the authority is not entitled to grant a license to the tenant.
The authority cannot mandate the shifting of an operational licensee's business based on objections raised after the statutory period, as such orders lack jurisdiction and must be supported with reas....
The State Government cannot relax excise policy restrictions on shifting liquor shops outside designated areas, as it contravenes established law requiring public notification.
The order permitting the shifting of the bar of the 5th respondent contained adequate reasons which met the requirements of Rule 17(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of License of Selling by Bar....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
