Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY
Kriday Realty Pvt. Ltd., – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over land classification and errors in records. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. authority's power to correct land records. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. commissioner’s duty to correct records per oss act. (Para 14) |
| 4. writ petition allowed as per findings. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr.Kanungo, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners and Mr.Mohapatra, learned counsel for Opposite Party No.5 as well as Mr.Das, learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.
3. The Petitioners in this writ petition have prayed for quashing of order dated 9th February 2024 (Annexure-2) passed by the Additional Commissioner, Bhubaneswar in OSS Case No.826/ 2023.
5. The admitted fact remains that in the Sabik ROR, it was recorded as Puratana Patita and while preparing the hal records, such extent of the land measuring Ac.1.016 dec. has been recorded in Jungle Kisam.
7. Perusal of the hal ROR under Annexure-1 admittedly reveals recording of the Kisam as Jungle in respect of Plot No.97. The real dispute involved here is that, the land in question was never in Jungle Kisam, but by wrong shifting of boundary line of the plot in the map, some Jungle, but Kisam lands were included. It is su
The authority under the Odisha Survey and Settlement Act can correct record of rights for errors without needing external permissions, affirming its broad jurisdiction to rectify mistakes made by set....
Settlement authorities cannot alter confirmed land assignments without legal basis, emphasizing the need to respect prior land grants and judicial confirmations.
A pending civil suit regarding land ownership limits the court's ability to make conclusive findings on that ownership, enforcing adherence to settlement operations based on factual measurements.
The court held that pending civil disputes regarding property ownership limit the ability to amend land records in administrative proceedings, necessitating resolution through the civil court.
Settlement authorities cannot override confirmed property rights without lawful authority; Judicial review ensures adherence to due process in land ownership disputes.
The main legal point established is the limitation of the Tahasildar's power in correcting the R.O.R. and map, and the Commissioner's authority to delegate jurisdiction, as well as the need for a lib....
Allegations of fraud in correction of public records must be specifically pleaded and substantiated, and procedural errors in addressing delay can render judicial decisions unsustainable.
An order correcting the Record of Rights is unsustainable if made beyond the limitation period without appropriate condonation or credible allegations of fraud being substantiated.
Land ownership disputes must consider all relevant plots for proper adjudication.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
