IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI, J.
Rina Behera – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha and Others – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 26070 of 2023
Decided On : 08-02-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of medical negligence and resultant pregnancy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's argument for compensation due to negligence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. opposite party's defense against negligence claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's analysis on compensation frameworks and petition validity. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. court's decision on compensation to be awarded. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
S.K. PANIGRAHI, J.
1. The Petitioner, in this Writ Petition, seeks a direction from this Court to the Opposite Parties/State to pay a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- towards compensation on account of medical negligence in conducting her sterilization surgery. The petitioner has claimed that the said defective sterilization operation has resulted in a lifetime financial burden on account of bringing up her third child.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
2. The Petitioner is a housewife and a mother of two children and her husband is a labourer. After having her second child, the petitioner wanted to include herself in the family planning awareness programme introduced by the Government of Odisha by way of female sterilization. Accordingly, on 18.07.2022, a sterilization operation was conducted by a team of the Opposite Party No.3/ Chief District Medical and Public Health Officer, Cuttack on the Petitioner/complainant and issued prior registration No.65 dated 28.02.2022 against Serial No.06/65 and L.C No.87 after fulfillment of all legal formalities laid therein.
3. However, after sterilization surgery, the Petitioner on observing the symptoms of pregnancy immediately proceeded to Nischintakoili CHC for tests. On proper treatment, her test results vide OPD No.11776 dated 14.12.2022 concluded that she was pregnant. Thereafter, on 06.02.2023 a further test was conducted at Salipur CHC vide OPD No.50079. The pathological investigation report admittedly made it clear that the petitioner was pregnant. The Petitioner gave birth to a male child on 16.07.2023. Challenging the negligence and carelessness of the Doctor while conducting the sterilization operation, the Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.
II. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner earnestly made the following submissions in support of his contentions.
5. On account of faulty operation and medical negligence of the doctor, the Petitioner became pregnant even after having a sterilization operation. This has led to substantial financial burden over the petitioner’s family considering that they shall not be able to avail the Government benefits because of the existence of third child. Moreover, on account of unwanted pregnancy, the family of the Petitioner would face financial hardship, mental agony etc. in future.
6. When the matter stood thus, due to unwanted pregnancy of the Petitioner even after sterilization operation, the Petitioner issued a legal notice to the Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3 for permanent solution and financial assistance/compensation as per law on 08.02.2023. However, all the efforts of the Petitioner went in vain due to the inaction of Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3. In such view of the matter, the Petitioner is entitled to Rs.25,00,000/- towards compensation for medical negligence and mental agony etc., future monetary expenses towards education, books, uniform and other miscellaneous expenses and other compensation due to wrong sterilize operation and pain.
III. SUBMISSIONS OF OPPOSITE PARTY NO.2:
7. Per contra, learned counsel for the Opp. Party No.2 intently made the following submissions:
8. At the time of operation, the left side Tube of the Petitioner was left due to adhesion. This fact was intimated to the Petitioner after operation and she was advised to take any temporary method of Family Planning from the Community Health Officer (CHO), Multipurpose Health Worker Female (MPHWF-) and ASHA. In this regard, the Community Health Officer and Health Worker Female, Jairampur Health Wellness Centre vide letter dated 18.08.2022 have also
AI
Compensation for sterilization failure under Family Planning Indemnity Scheme is fixed at Rs.60,000, limiting claims against negligent medical practices unless statutory provisions allow for higher a....
Compensation for failed sterilization claims arises from surgical negligence, not childbirth; exceptional circumstances may warrant financial relief.
Medical professionals must ensure proper care in sterilization procedures; failure results in state liability to compensate for unwanted births and upbringing costs.
Medical officers must exercise reasonable care in sterilization procedures to avoid liability for resulting unwanted pregnancies, entitling affected parties to compensation.
Negligence in performing sterilisation operation entitles the petitioner to compensation, and the State Government is responsible for such negligence.
Medical officers are liable for negligence in family planning operations, especially if their failure causes unexpected pregnancies, resulting in financial burden.
Negligence in performing sterilization surgery mandates state compensation for economic burdens arising from an unwanted child, reaffirming the responsibilities of medical professionals within family....
State accountability for negligence in family planning procedures ensures compensation for economic burdens caused by unwanted births.
The burden lies on the defendants to prove that there was no negligence in cases of failed sterilization operation. The court also emphasized the need for the State Government to devise provisions fo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.