ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, JJ.
M/s Ecometrix Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and another - Petitioners
Versus
Bhubaneswar Development Authority, BBSR and others - Opp. Parties
W.P.(C) No. 33871 of 2022
Decided On : 08-08-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the petitioners and the rfp process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner argues against arbitrary cancellation and blacklisting. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court reviews procedural fairness and principles of natural justice. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. natural justice principles in administrative actions. (Para 9 , 19) |
| 5. court emphasizes need for proportionality in administrative actions. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. court discusses necessity of show cause notice prior to blacklisting. (Para 31 , 33) |
| 7. court quashes illegal blacklisting and restores contract. (Para 34) |
Judgment :
DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.
M/s Ecometrix Consultants Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, as petitioner no.1, and the Manager (Finance) of the said company, as petitioner no.2, have filed this writ petition seeking to quash the letter dated 21.10.2022 under Annexure-5, by which the Letter of Award for selection of Survey Agency issued in favour of the petitioner no.1- company, vide letter dated 13.09.2022, has been cancelled/terminated, since petitioner no.1-company failed to fulfill the terms and conditions, as mentioned in sl. nos.3 and 4 of the above Letter of Award along with the conditions stipulated in Clause-13 of the Request for Proposal (RFP), within stipulated date and time, and the petitioner no.1-company has been blacklisted and banned for at least 3 years to be employed anywhere in the authority works with a warning not to submit any proposal, as Survey Agency, with Bubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) in future, otherwise the same would be rejected.
2. The factual matrix of the case, in a nutshell, is that petitioner no.1, as a consulting company, was established in the year 2015 for providing professional services in GIS, ITES, Water, Environmental and Social Sectors and, as such, petitioner no.1-company has adequate knowledge and experience in providing the same. Therefore, it is empanelled with Odisha Remote Sensing Space Application Centre (ORSAC) and Maharastra Remote Sensing Space Application Centre (MRSAC) along with other Government bodies, such as, Town and Country Planning Authority, Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Organization, Odisha Public Health Engineering Department, Odisha, Bhubaneswar Development Authority, Odisha, etc. and being engaged in various projects of different organizations, the petitioner no.1-company has completed the assignments/ works in time. Apart from the same, many of the works are ongoing in different organizations.
2.1 Opposite party no.1-BDA, which was constituted under the Orissa Development Authorities Act, 1982, and functioning under the control and supervision of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Govt. of Odisha, issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) on 29.07.2022. In response to the same, the petitioner no.1-company applied for selection of Survey Agency for survey and field verification of land parcels for land demarcation of various plots of land with BDA. Such RFP contained two bid systems, viz., technical and financial. As per the RFP, the date of availability of RFP document was 20.08.2022, the date and time of pre- bid meeting was fixed to 03.08.2022 at 4.00 P.M. in the Conference Room, BDA, Akash Shobha Building, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar, the last date and time for receipt of proposals was fixed to 22.08.2022 till 3.00 P.M., place of submission of proposals was before the Secretary, BDA, Akash Shobha Building, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar and the date and time for opening of technical proposal was fixed to 24.08.2022 at 4.00 P.M. In adherence to the conditions of the RFP, petitioner no.1- company submitted its bid, which was considered and intimation was sent to the petitioner no.1-company, vide letter dated 13.09.2022, that it was selected as L-1 to undertake survey work as per RFP dated 29.07.2022 and was issued with Letter of Award (LoA) of even date along with format of performance guarantee agreement. Thereafter, the petitioner no.1-company
M/s Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of West Bengal and Anr.
Mahabir Auto Stores and others v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
Vetinda Pharmaceuticals Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Gorkha Security Services v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others
Rattan Lal Sharma v Managing Committee
A.K. Kraipak and others v. Union of India
Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India
Basudeo Tiwary vs. Sido Kanhu University and others
Nagarjuna Construction Company Limited v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Uma Nath Panday and others v State of U.P. and others
Blacklisting without notice constitutes a violation of the principles of natural justice, requiring fair opportunity for the affected party to present their case.
The requirement for a fair hearing and a specific show cause notice before imposing the severe civil consequence of blacklisting, and the need for the authority to determine the period of punishment ....
The Petitioner's suppression of a material fact and approach to the Court with unclean hands led to the dismissal of the Petition.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a fair hearing, specific show cause notices, and proportionate punishment before imposing blacklisting in government contracts.
Point of Law : Blacklisting is an 'instrument of coercion' which has the effect of creating a disability. Usually, when participating in a tender, the bidder is required to furnish a statement undert....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.