SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 1116

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R. MOHAPATRA, SAVITRI RATHO, JJ.
State Of Odisha, Represented Through The Secretary, Department Of Scheduled Tribe And Scheduled Caste – Appellant 
Versus
Subham Kumar Dora, Son Of Sri Ashok - Respondent
W.A. NO.2054 OF 2023
Decided On : 02-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
For the Respondent:Ms. Deepali Mahapatra, Advocate

Caste certificate issuance must adhere to verification requirements reflecting historical residency and ancestry, as established in relevant laws, necessitating careful examination of applicants' backgrounds.

Headnote:(A) Orissa Caste Certificate (for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) Rules, 1980 - Rule 4 - Intra-Court Appeal concerning the issuance of caste certificate - The Writ Court directed the issuance unless cogent reasons for rejection were established while considering the verification of the caste certificate of the Respondent's grandfather. (Paras 3, 15)

(B) Caste Certificate Issuance - Verification requirements must confirm that the individual and their parents belong to the claimed community, adhering to Presidential Order provisions, as well as considering historical residency in the State. (Paras 4, 14)

Facts of the case:
The Respondent applied for a caste certificate claiming Scheduled Tribe status as 'Kondadora', which was previously issued to his father, but later canceled based on revenue records listing them as 'Telenga'. Evidence suggests the Respondent’s ancestors resided in Odisha prior to 1950, affecting their caste claims. (Paras 7, 14)

Findings of Court:
Rejection of the earlier caste certificate was upheld, and the case was remitted back to the Tahasildar for a fresh review, addressing the origins and historical claims of caste status. (Paras 15, 16)

Issues: The core issue was the validity of caste certificate issuance in light of prior cancellations and historical records affecting caste status claims. (Paras 5, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court determined that status claims are grounded in ancestry and historical residency before the Presidential Order, necessitating thorough verification by authorities to establish entitlement over caste certification. (Paras 10, 14)

Result: Writ Appeal disposed of; matter remitted for fresh adjudication.

Table of Content
1. verification requirements for caste certificate issuance. (Para 4)
2. status of caste certificate based on familial history. (Para 5 , 6 , 10)
3. clarifications on caste certificates for migrants. (Para 7 , 9)
4. arguments regarding township of origin and identity. (Para 11 , 12)
5. the necessity for reviewing caste status based on relevant laws. (Para 13)
6. final order directing fresh decision for issuance of caste certificate. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Perused the kind minutes of the Hon’ble the Chief Justice at Flag-‘Z’ assigning the matter to be heard by a Division Bench presided over by Sri K. R. Mohapatra, J. Accordingly, the matter is listed before this Bench.

3. This intra-Court Appeal is filed assailing the order dated 3rd August, 2023 in W.P.(C). No.16069 of 2023, wherein, the Writ Court directed to issue caste certificate in favour of the Respondent forthwith unless the application is rejected on some cogent reasons other than those mentioned in the order impugned in the writ petition and pendency of verification of caste certificate of the writ Petitioner’s grandfather or any other relative.

4. Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that Rule 4 of the Orissa Caste Certificate (for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) Rules, 1980 (for short, ‘Rules’) clearly provides as under:-

4. Verification of caste Where a person claims to belong to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe it should be verified-

(1) That the person and his parents actually belong to the community claimed.

(2) That the community is included in the Presidential Order specifying the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in relation to the State of Orissa.

(3) That the person belongs to the State of Orissa and to the area in respect of which the community has been scheduled.

(4) If a person claims to be a Scheduled Caste, he should profess either the Hindu or Sikh religion.

(5) If a person claims to be a Scheduled Tribe, he may profess any religion.”

Thus, while issuing the caste certificate, the competent authority under the Rules shall verify that the person and his parents actually belong to the community claimed. Secondly, the community is included in the Presidential Order, 1950 specifying the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in relation to the State of Odisha. Thirdly, the person belongs to the State of Odisha and the area in respect of which the community has been scheduled and fourthly, if a person claims to be a Scheduled Tribe, he may profess any religion.

5. In the instant case, the core question that arises for consideration is whether the caste certificate granted in favour of the father and grandfather of the Respondent can be ignored for issuance of a caste certificate, as claimed by him.

6. Elaborating his submission, Mr. Mishra, learned ASC submits that earlier father of the Respondent was issued with a caste certificate stating that he belongs of ‘Kondadora’ by caste, which is a Scheduled Tribe under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950 (for brevity ‘Presidential Order’).

7. On an application made by one Netrananda Bhoi, Revenue Misc. Case No.310 of 2002 was initiated on the file Tahasildar, Tusura and the caste certificate issued in favour of the father of the Respondent was cancelled. The revenue records describe the caste of the father and grandfather of the Respondent to be ‘Telenga’.

8. He submitted that the Respondent had admitted before the competent authority namely Tahasildar, Tusura that his forefathers had migrated from ‘Telangana’. Thus, the clarification issued by the Government of India in the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment on 22nd February, 2018 under Annexure-5 is squarely applicable to the case of the Respondent. Clarification is issued therein with regard to issuance of caste certificate to the migrants.

9. The relevant paragraph of the said clarification under Annexure-5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top