Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH, V.NARASINGH
Purna Bhatra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments by both parties regarding evidence (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis on evidence and credibility (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. ratio decidendi on alteration of conviction (Para 13) |
| 5. final conclusion and disposition of the appeal (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
The above noted Appellant, by the impugned judgment of conviction, has been convicted for commission of offence under section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, ‘the IPC ’) and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand), in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) month for commission of the said offence.
2. On 24.10.2018 around 8.00 a.m., when the accused was taking paddy from the field of Sada Bhatra, protest was made from the side of said Sada Bhatra and then the accused assaulted Sada by means of an iron rod and stone. Said Sada, receiving the injuries, fell down on the ground and lost his sense. Thereafter, Sada, being taken to the Hospital, was declared dead by the Medical Officer, who examined him.
3. In course of investigation, the Investigating Officer (I.O- P.W.20
The Court ruled that provocation and lack of intent in a homicide can warrant a conviction under culpable homicide instead of murder.
The court determined that the Appellant's actions lacked intent to kill, leading to a conviction under Section 304 Part-II instead of Section 302.
It is the quality and not the quantity which determines the adequacy of evidence. Evidence has to be weighed not counted.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between culpable homicide and murder under the Indian Penal Code, and the assessment of the accused's knowledge and intention in....
The court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-I, considering the absence of prior intent and planning.
The essential ingredient of motive/intention under Section 302 IPC must be established to convict a person for the offence of murder.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the intention to cause death is a crucial factor in determining whether an act amounts to murder under Section 302 of the IPC or culpable h....
Modifying conviction from murder to manslaughter due to lack of intent and premeditation, establishing a precedent for considering trivial disputes in assessing culpability.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's reliance on eyewitness testimonies and medical evidence to establish the guilt of the appellant for the offence under section 304 part ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
