Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BISWANATH RATH
Debadatta Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks permission to conduct cases. (Para 1) |
| 2. background on petitioner's appointments. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. challenge to permission denial based on role. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. opposing party defends denial of permission. (Para 6) |
| 5. court discusses facts and duties of the petitioner. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. analysis of rule 14 and implications. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 7. court’s decision regarding permission and order. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
Judgment :
1. This Writ Petition involves the following prayer:-
And may further be pleased to pass any other order/order(s), direction/directions(s) as would be deemed fit and proper.
2. Background involving the case is that Petitioner is an Advocate by profession. He was appointed as Government Pleader in Bargarh District vide notification No.10350/L dated 17.10.2016 issued by Opposite Party No.1 appearing at Annexure-1. Petitioner assumed position to act as a Government Pleader with intimation to Collector, Bargarh on 17.10.2016, communication appears to be at Annexure-2 since was conducting 69(sixty nine) number of cases on behalf of defence against the Government, Petitioner sought for permission to conduct the cases by forwarding the list ther
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
