SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1646

NAND PRABHA SHUKLA
Vishram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

NAND PRABHA SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard Sri Vishram Singh (petitioner in person), Sri R.K. Verma, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

2. The present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the following prayers:

3. It has been submitted by Engr. Vishram Singh (petitioner in person) that he wants to appear as an Agent/Attorney to conduct and argue the case on behalf of Anand Kumar Rajpoot in Case Crime No. 04/2022 under Sections 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Swaroop Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar, Case No. 92145/2022 pending before learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-II, Kanpur Nagar.

4. In the matter in hand one Rakesh Chandel who is an Advocate filed the case against Anand Kumar Rajpoot. As the said Advocate was an aggressive person, therefore, no Advocate agreed to contest on behalf of Anand Kumar Rajpoot. Accordingly, he wanted to engage Engr. Vishram Singh as Mukhtar/Attorney to conduct his case and moved an application 7-Kha with a prayer to appoint Engr. Vishram Singh as his Agent/Attorney to conduct and argue the case but the learned Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar, vide order dated 28.7.2023, had rejected the appli

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top