Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Dhyan Foundation – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge against prior court orders and claim of ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. rival claims regarding ownership and interim custody of cattle. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. allegations of forgery in documents by opposite party no.3. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. importance of animal welfare in legal considerations. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. criminality of cattle transportation and associated legal repercussions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. judicial perspective on interim custody based on past cases. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. judicial analysis of reversible errors in revisional orders. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. superior rights of the petitioner over the opposite party no.3. (Para 18) |
| 9. final decision and remand for fresh consideration. (Para 19 , 20) |
S.S. Mishra, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred the instant petition assailing the legality and judicial propriety of the impugned order dated 01.11.2023 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Mayurbhanj, Baripada in Criminal Revision No.28 of 2023 setting aside the order dated 16th September, 2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class-1 (Cog. Taking), Baripada in Criminal Misc. Case No.249/2023, whereby the Revisional Court rel
Point of Law : Section 451 Cr.P.C. it appears that unless owner of the animal in respect of which he is facing prosecution, is deprived of the custody (which can be done only on his conviction under ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the accused, prima facie guilty of causing cruelty to the animals, was not entitled to interim custody of the seized cattle.
Section 35 of the Act provides that for proper care and treatment of animals in respect of which offences under this Act have been committed, such animal can be kept in pinjrapole with a direction th....
Section 11(5) provides that “on receipt of the report, the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class may, on his being satisfied that there is enough material to presume that a prima-facie offence under this Act....
Ownership of animals does not guarantee custody if the owner fails to comply with legal requirements for their transport and care, as established under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and re....
The discretion of the Magistrate in granting interim custody and the need for expeditious trial proceedings to avoid prolonged custody of seized animals.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
