Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.K.PATTANAIK
Goutam Charan Das – Appellant
Versus
Biswadarsani Das – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim maintenance orders and procedural background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments surrounding dual claims for maintenance. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on jurisdiction and maintenance claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. determining quantum of maintenance with respect to previous orders. (Para 10) |
| 5. conclusion on the legality of the previous orders. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Instant revision is filed by the petitioner assailing the correctness, legality and judicial propriety of the impugned order under Annexure-1 passed in Criminal Appeal No.80 of 2021 by learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Cuttack, whereby, the decision of learned S.D.J.M.(Sadar), Cuttack in D.V. Misc. Case No.44 of 2021 under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violance Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the DV Act’) granting interim maintenance in favour of the opposite party stands confirmed though with reduction of monthly alimony on the grounds inter alia that the same is not sustainable in law and hence, therefore, liable to be interfered with and set aside in the interest of justice.
3. Heard Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parida-2, learned c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
