Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.SAHOO
Prasannajit Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis for the anticipatory bail application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim of false accusation due to political rivalry. (Para 3) |
| 3. importance of addressing illegal mining systematically. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. rejection of bail due to criminal history. (Para 7) |
| 5. appreciation of legal assistance provided during the case. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
S.K. SAHOO, J.
The petitioner has knocked at the portals of this Court for grant of anticipatory bail under section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure apprehending arrest in connection with Jakhapura P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022 corresponding to C.T. Case No. 102 of 2022 pending in the Court of J.M.F.C., Jajpur Road for commission of offences under section 379 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 21 of the Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereafter ‘M.M.D.R. Act’).
2. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that basing on a public complaint received from the villagers regarding theft of morrum by the petitioner, the Tahasildar, Danagadi vide letter No.318 dated 25.01.2022 lodged a written report before the Inspector in-charge of Jakhapura police station stating therein that on receipt of the aforesaid compla
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
