VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Abhishek Kukreti – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Sri Kripa Shankar Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Mahipal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ratan Singh alongwith Sri Vibhav Ojha, learned AGA for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the first information report dated 28.04.2023, arising out of case crime no.85 of 2023, under sections 379, 411 IPC and Section 4/21 Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Police Station Nagina Dehat, District Bijnor. Further, the petitioners are seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to take appropriate action/departmental inquiry against the responsible respondents, who were involved in the proceeding of seizing of the vehicles concern as well as false arresting of said drivers in pursuance of the impugned first information report.
3. Sole submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that in view of Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to 'MMDR Act') the FIR could not have been registered as it provides that only a complaint could have been lodged by the authorized person.
4. In support, it is submit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.