ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
Susanta Kumar Panda – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer Bhawanipatna Central Co-Operative Bank – Respondent
W.P.(C) No.18811 of 2021
Decided On : 23-08-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the promotional process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counterarguments by the bank regarding promotion eligibility. (Para 3) |
| 3. maintainability issues of the writ petition. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's reasoning and legal principles applied. (Para 5) |
| 5. final decision on the writ petition. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT :
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.
Assailed in the writ petition is the List of Banking Assistants declared eligible for appearing in Written (Merit) Test scheduled to be held on 20.06.2021 for promotion of Banking Assistants-I to next higher grade, i.e., Assistant Manager-II issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Bhawanipatna Central Co-operative Bank, Bhawanipatna in the district of Kalahandi, as enclosed to Letter Reference No.1208— OSCB (ACST) Trg./2019- 20, dated 11.06.2021 of the Principal, Agricultural Cooperative Staff Training Institute, for invocation of provisions under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer(s):
“The petitioners therefore most respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to:
i) admit this case,
ii) issue notice to opposite parties for show cause;
iii) quash the list of Banking Assistants eligible for appearing Written (Merit) Test issued by Chief Executive Officer, Bhawanipatna Central Co- Operative Bank, Bhawanipatna in the district of Kalahandi which is was held on 20.06.2021 under Annexure-4 and no result shall be published without leave of the Hon’ble Court till the final adjudication of the writ application and direct the opposite party No.1 to allow the petitioners to participate in the aforesaid Test along with 38 candidates in another date fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
And pass such further order/orders, direction/directions as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and allow the case with cost;
And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
Facts:
2. The facts as adumbrated in the writ petition reveal that the petitioners, appointees by the Chief Executive Officer, Bhawanipatna Central Co-Operative Bank, Bhawanipatna, District of Kalahandi, (the opposite party No.1) as Banking Assistants in the various Branches, have been placed in the Final Gradation List published in 2015 at Serial No.111, 126, 112, 129, 125, 102, 118, 135, 110, 100, 116 and 130 respectively.
2.1. The Chief Executive Officer, Bhawanipatna Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., the opposite party No.1, issued a Letter No.67/HR/GAD/2020-21, dated 12.04.2021 to the Principal, Agricultural Cooperative Staff Training Institute-opposite party No.2 for conducting Written Examination in consonance with Rule 17 of the Human Resource Policy for the Central Cooperative Banks of Odisha incorporating the Staff Service Rules, 2011 (“HR Policy” for brevity) for filling up of fourteen vacant posts of Assistant Manager-II by way of promotion.
2.2. While the said process was in progress, the Chief Executive Officer, Bhawanipatna Central Co-operative Bank, Bhawanipatna in the district of Kalahandi, the opposite party No.1, by Letter Reference No.1208— OSCB (ACST) Trg./2019-20, dated 11.06.2021 addressed to the Principal, Agricultural Cooperative Staff Training Institute instructed to conduct Merit (Written) Test for promotion of Banking Assistants-I to next higher grade, i.e., (Assistant Manager-II) of Bhawanipatna Central Co-Operative Bank, Bhawanipatna in tune with the provisions under Rule 17 of HR Policy.
2.3. The case of the petitioners is that the promotion policy mentioned in sub-rule (d) of Rule 17 of the HR Policy laid down that, “Promotion may be based on Written Test, interview and Performance Appraisal for Group-C to Group-B, and Group-B to Group-A. For promotions within Group-A, it could be based on interview and Performance Appraisal. 3 times of the number of vacancies for promotion shall be called for the tests.”
2.4. Though the required number of participants in the interview were forty-two, at the time of interview only thirty-eight pa
State of Assam Vrs. Barak Upatyaka D.U. Karmachari Sanstha
Vide, Anandi Mukta Sadguru Trust Vrs. V.R. Rudani
VST Industries Ltd. Vrs. VST Industries Workers’ Union & Anr.
The court determined that cooperative banks do not qualify as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution, thus are not amenable to writ jurisdiction.
Writ petitions against private co-operative societies are not maintainable under Article 226 unless they demonstrate public authority status.
Writ jurisdiction does not extend to enforcing cooperative society bye laws, which lack the force of law and are treated as private contractual obligations.
Exercise of power by the Registrar, under bye-laws and regulations framed thereunder by the Society itself, but not having statutory force, is not amenable to writ jurisdiction.
Writ petitions against cooperative societies are not maintainable unless they perform public functions or can be classified as public authorities as per Article 12.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.