Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
B.R.SARANGI
Sidheswar Mahila Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. withdrawal of contract due to alleged safety violations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on the validity of actions taken against shg. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's procedural overview and consideration of parties' arguments. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. importance of natural justice in administrative actions. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. history and principles surrounding natural justice. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. court quashes earlier order for lack of fairness. (Para 17) |
| 7. conclusion: writ petition disposed without costs. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioners, by way of this writ petition, seek to quash order dated 31.07.2019 in Annexure-5 disengaging petitioner no.1-Self Help Group (SHG) and blacklisting it for a period of five years by forfeiting the security deposits, on the ground that the same was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice.
2.1 The petitioner no.1 SHG was engaged in preparing Chhatua/Ladoo as per the indent submitted by the CDPO, Balipatana for every month. It was supplying Chhatua/Ladoo for the beneficiaries by entering into agreement as per Annexure-3 for a period of one year from 01.07.2018 to 30.06.2019. The said period of contract was extended
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
