SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 788

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
D.DASH
Siba Charan Panda – Appellant
Versus
Krupasindhu Panda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Manoj Ku. Agrawalla

Table of Content
1. factual basis of the contract dispute (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. court's assessment of evidence and judgments (Para 8 , 12 , 13)
3. plaintiff's obligation to prove readiness and willingness to perform (Para 10 , 11 , 16)
4. final dismissal of the appeal (Para 17)

JUDGMENT :

D. DASH, J.

1. The Appellant, in this Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the Code’), has assailed the judgment and decree 22.04.1991 and 08.05.1991 respectively passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhadrak in S.J. Appeal No.35/14 of 1986/1987.

By the same, the Appeal filed by the Appellant (Plaintiff) under section 96 of the Code in challenging the judgment and decree dated 09.04.1986 and 21.04.1986 respectively passed by the learned Sub-Judge, Bhadrak in O.S. No.52 of 1979-I in decreeing the suit filed by the Appellant as the Plaintiff have been set aside.

The Appellant, as the Plaintiff, had filed the suit for specific performance of contract for sale in respect of the suit land with further prayer for confirmation of his possession over the same and in the alternative, for recovery of possession in case of dispossession. The suit, having be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top