IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.MURALIDHAR, CJ, M.S.RAMAN, J.
Shyam Kumar Behera and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of Odisha and Others – Respondents
W.A. No.411 of 2019
Decided On : 10-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for government takeover of school (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against government decision on school takeover (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. opposition viewpoint on policy discretion (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's analysis on legality of government decisions and discretion (Para 7) |
| 5. court's order to reconsider government decision (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER :
1. The intra-Court Appeal styled under Clause 10 of the Letters Pattent read with Rule 2 of Chapter VIII of the Odisha High Court Rules, 1948, has been preferred by Appellants (Petitioners in the writ petition, staff of V.S.S. Panchayat High School, Bargaon in the district of Sambalpur) assailing the Order dated 30.08.2019 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.15252 of 2019 on the ground that the Judgment rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Director, Elementary Education v. Dibakar Pradhan , Civil Appeal No. 2104 of 2004, vide Order dated 16.02.2010, laying down that “it is in the discretion of the State Government to take over a school or not, it cannot be compelled to do so. After all, taking over of a school has financial and other implications” has been misplaced on the facts and in the circumstances of the instant case.
The writ petition:
2. The Petitioners approached this Court by way of writ petition W.P.(C) No.15252 of 2019 invoking provisions of Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India questioning the propriety of decision of Principal Secretary to the Government vide Office Order bearing No.9973d-XIV-SME-(IX)-LC-I-79/2015/SME, dated 08.05.2019, whereby the subject-school has been denied to be taken over by the Government taking shelter of Letter No.20645, dated 24.06.1994.
2.1. The Petitioners’ school became eligible to come within the fold of minimum Grant-in-Aid (for short, “GiA”) during 1991-92 with effect from 01.03.1991 and accordingly required information was supplied to proper quarter. It is asserted by the Petitioners that the Letter dated 24.06.1994 of the Government showing intention to take over all non-Government fully aided High Schools was not communicated, as a consequence of which even though the Petitioners’ school received full salary cost with effect from 01.06.1994, and eligible to be taken over by virtue of Letter dated 24.06.1994, the same was discriminated.
2.2. The Government of Odisha in School and Mass Education Department vide Letter dated 24.06.1994 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) has communicated its decision to take over non- Government fully aided High Schools, which is reproduced hereunder:
“Government of Orissa
Department of School & Mass Education No VIII-SM (M)-03/94 (Pt.)-20645/SME, dated 24.06.1994
From
Sri P. Rout,
Additional Secretary to Government
To
The Director, Secondary Education,
Orissa, Bhubaneswar.
Sub: Taking over all Non-Government fully aided High Schools by the State Government.
Sir,
I am directed to say that Government have decided on 07.06.94 to take over all the Non-Government aided High Schools in receipt of full salary cost. To implement the Government decision, the Management of the concerned institutions may be informed to pass unanimous resolutions if they so desire to hand over the management of their respectively institutions alongwith the approved teaching and non-teaching staff including all assets as on 07.06.94 to Government.
2. It should be made clear that Government will not take over any liability whatsoever while taking over the management of institutions.
3. Further the managements may also be asked to obtain written consent of each approved-regular teaching and regular non- teaching staff, existing on their rolls as on 07.06.94 to the effect that he/she will abide by the conditions of services applicable to Government servants in all matters including age of superannuation.
4. The resolutions along with the written consent referred to above should reach, the Department latest by 31.07.94.
5. You are, therefore, requested to take adequate steps to ensure submission o
The court emphasized the principle of equality in state actions, ruling that the government's discretion to take over schools must not result in discriminatory treatment against institutions similarl....
Administrative orders must contain reasoning to ensure legality and proper evaluation of statutory compliance; failure to do so renders the order susceptible to review.
Educational Institution - There is no specific Act, Rule or statutory backing for passing provincialisation order as it could have been issued in an exceptional circumstance but following norms. Peti....
The Transfer of Management Act 1971 requires strict adherence to procedural safeguards, including the right to a fair hearing, before any drastic action such as transferring management can be taken a....
The court established that an institution's right to grant-in-aid crystallizes under earlier government orders, and arbitrary denial based on newer policies violates constitutional rights.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State Government complied with the court's order to revisit and reframe the policy, and the applicants did not qualify the test of composi....
Recognition and financial aid for educational institutions must align with equitable staff employment and ensure compliance with established legal conditions for staff remuneration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.