IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
SANJU PANDA, S.K. PANIGRAHI, JJ.
Reetanjali Sahu – Petitioner
Versus
The Ministewr Law Odisha and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 25751 of 2020
Decided On : 08-10-2020
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sale of deity's property under ohre act. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's challenge to auction process. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. importance of reasoned decisions in law. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. impugned order lacks reasoning. (Para 12) |
| 5. court restores prior order; writ petition disposed. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
This matter is taken up through video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. P.K. Rath, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.
3. The petitioner, in this writ petition challenges the order dated 01.03.2019 passed by opposite party no.1 permitting sale of the Deity’s property at a throw away lower price and to proceed with the auction in violation of fair and transparent manner without any reason assigned thereof while dissenting with the judgment dated 11.12.2018 passed by the learned Commissioner of Endowments, Odisha, Bhubaneswar in O.A. No. 08 of 2004 under section 19 of the Odisha Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1951, hereinafter to be referred as the “OHRE Act”.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the deity, Radha Krishna Lalita Temple, Bije Hinjili in the district of Ganjam through its Interim Trustee, had filed an application under section 19 of the OHRE Act, before the learned Commissioner of Endowments for according permission of sale of the lands as mentioned in the schedule of the petition. The said application was registered as O.A. No. 08 of 2004. It has been stated by the deity-institution that the landed properties of the deity-institution are under the possession of the tenants, who are paying Raj-bhog under the O.L.R. Act. Due to promulgation of the O.L.R. Act, the income of the temple has been reduced and it is difficult to manage the temple with the limited income. The institution is also facing difficulties in protecting the land from the greedy eye of Arun the land grabbers. The institution is not getting any income from the case schedule land. Therefore, the sale of the lands in question is essential and beneficial for the institution, if the sale proceeds will be deposited in any Nationalized Bank. Accordingly, it was proposed to sell the land at the prevailing market rate and to keep the sale proceeds in fixed deposit scheme so that it will earn better revenue in shape of interest. Public notice as required under Section 19 of the OHRE Act was published in the locality inviting objections from the Hindu Public against the proposed sale, but no-body came forward to file any objection.
5. Learned Commissioner of Endowments vide judgment dated 11.12.2018 allowed the appeal and directed that the land as per the schedule is to be put to public auction with the upset price @ Rs. 70,00,000/- (rupees seventy lakhs) per acre. He has also directed that the auction shall be conducted in the presence of the Addl. Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Berhampur as well as the Local Inspector of Endowments with a condition that at least 30 days prior to the date of public auction, it shall be advertised by beat of drums in the locality as well as by publication in any daily Oriya newspapers like Dharitri, Samaj, Sambad, Samay etc or English daily like Times of India etc. having wide circulation in the locality. If necessary, the deity-institution during the public auction, in order to maintain law and order situation shall take the help of the local police. The sale proceeds shall be kept in any Nationalized Bank under long term fixed deposit scheme in the name of the deity Sri Radha Krushna Lalita Temple; it shall be pledged in favour of the Commissioner of Endowments, Odisha, Bhubaneswar. The sale shall be effected within six months after expiry of the period of appeal/revision, if no appeal/ revision is preferred in the meanwhile, and in case of appeal or revision, then subject to orders of such Appellate/Revisional Authority. Amended provision of section 19 (c) (i) of the O.H.R.E. Act shall be strictly followed. Accordingly the copy of the judgment was sen
M/s. Kranti Asso. Pvt. Ltd & Another vs. Masood Ahmed Khan & Ors
The court emphasized that decisions affecting public interest must be accompanied by clear reasoning to ensure transparency and fair play, particularly in matters of auction concerning religious prop....
The auction of temple property was rendered invalid due to significant procedural violations under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutor....
The court ruled that the rejection of a No Objection Certificate application under Section 19-A of the Act for private deities was erroneous, emphasizing compliance with procedural rules over unsuppo....
The learned Commissioner must properly evaluate evidence regarding the nature of a Deity as public or private under Section 19-A of the Act before deciding on the No Objection Certificate for land al....
(1) Auction Sale of Land – After public auction is held and highest bid is received and property is sold in a public auction in favour of a highest bidder, such a sale cannot be set aside on the basi....
The court ruled that the lease of temple property was unjustifiable due to non-compliance with statutory requirements and lack of necessity, emphasizing the prioritization of temple interests over pu....
A lease for temple property must demonstrate necessity and benefit to the deity; merely augmenting income is insufficient and procedural violations render the decision unjustifiable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.