SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 1168

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SHYAMLATA AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR SARAFF – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

A.C.BEHERA, J.

This revision under Section 115 of the C.P.C., 1908 has been filed by the petitioners against the Opposite Parties praying for setting aside the impugned order dated 26.12.2023 passed in C.S. No.01 of 2018 by the learned District Judge, Nuapada.

2. The petitioners and the Opposite Parties in this revision are the defendants and plaintiffs respectively in the suit vide C.S. No.01 of 2018 under Section 92 of the C.P.C., 1908 pending in the court of learned District Judge, Nuapada.

3. The factual backgrounds of this revision, which prompted the petitioners(defendants in the suit vide C.S. No.01 of 2018) for filing of the same is that, the Opposite Parties in this revision being the plaintiffs filed the suit vide C.S. No.01 of 2018 under Section 92 of the C.P.C., 1908 in the court of the learned District Judge, Nuapada against the defendants (petitioners in this revision) along with CMA No.3 of 2017 praying for granting leave to the plaintiffs for the institution of that suit under Section 92 of the C.P.C., 1908 against the defendants.

After hearing from both the sides in CMA No.3 of 2017, the learned District Judge, Nuapada allowed that CMA No.3 of 2017 on dated 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top