Back
ORISSA HIGH COURT
R.VENKAT RAMANAN@R.VANKET RAMANANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
G.SATAPATHY, J.
1. This criminal revision is directed against the impugned order dated 29.08.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ganjam at Berhampur in G.R. Case No. 367 of 2011-(B) refusing to discharge the petitioner from the criminal case for commission of offences punishable U/S.120(B)/420/ 468/471/34 of IPC r/w. Sections 4/5/6 of Prize Chits & Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 (in short, “the Act”).
2. Briefly stated, the allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner and others by entering into conspiracy allured the informant to deposit/invest money in Right Max Techno Trade Company on the assurance of giving high returns. The said company was manned by the petitioner and others and believing the statement of one V.Lachmeya Reddy of such company to get triple return on investment in just 33 months, the informant deposited Rs.60,000/- in the said company on 31.02.2010/01.03.2010 and in the process, the company also received investment/deposit from the other villagers, who invested certain amounts in the company, but when N.Dinabandhu Reddy, the informant came to know about closure of the company and did not get back any money,
A discharge petition requires sufficient prima facie evidence; an absence in FIR or co-accused acquittals alone cannot substantiate discharge claims.
The court emphasized the limited scope of the court's jurisdiction under the Criminal Procedure Code at the stage of framing of charges, highlighting the need to accept the material brought on record....
The rejection of a discharge application is valid when a prima facie case exists based on the police report, regardless of subsequent exoneration in departmental inquiries.
At the discharge stage, the court must determine if there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused based on the prosecution's evidence, without conducting a mini-trial.
The court upheld the rejection of a discharge application, emphasizing that a prima facie case must exist without conducting a mini-trial, affirming the principles of evidence evaluation at the disch....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 245(2) and 245(1) Cr.P.C. in the context of discharging the accused at different stages of the cas....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
