SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 504

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA, J.
Sudhir Ranjan Mohapatro and Others - Petitioners 
Versus
Kameswar Mohapatro and Another - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No.20992 of 2025
Decided On : 19-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Basudev Mishra, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties :Mr. P. K. Mishra, Advocate.

The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 permits eviction of children from self-acquired property of parents when allegations of abuse justify such action to ensure their safety and dignity.

Headnote:(A) The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Sections 4 and 16 - Writ petition challenging eviction order - Eviction of children ordered to ensure senior citizens' security and dignity due to allegations of physical and mental torture from children - Tribunal had jurisdiction to order eviction as necessary for the welfare of senior citizens. (Paras 12, 20, 21)

(B) Beneficial Statute - Interpretation of the Act should be purposive to fulfill the intention of the legislature to protect senior citizens from oppression by children. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners are the sons and daughters-in-law of aged parents who sought eviction under the Act after experiencing alleged physical and mental torture. The property in question is owned by the mother, who resides there with her husband. (Paras 2, 6)

Findings of Court:
The appellate tribunal confirmed the need for eviction to protect senior citizens' rights and safety based on their allegations. (Paras 20, 21)

Issues: Whether the Collector had jurisdiction to order eviction under the Act when the initial complaint was for maintenance; whether the allegations of torture warranted eviction. (Paras 10, 11)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the intention of the Act is to safeguard senior citizens from abuse, and eviction can be ordered to protect them. (Paras 12, 13, 20)

Result: Writ petition dismissed, order for eviction upheld.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. court’s reasoning on statutory rights of senior citizens (Para 8 , 12 , 19)
3. arguments against eviction ruling (Para 10 , 11 , 20)
4. interpretation of beneficial statutes (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18)
5. unsuccessful challenge to eviction order (Para 21 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

A.C. Behera, J.

This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing the final order dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure-7) passed in Misc. Appeal No.03 of 2024 by the Collector, Gajapati.

2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioners for filing of the same is that, the O.Ps of this writ petition being the old father and mother of the petitioner Nos.1 & 3 and old father-in-law and mother-in-law of the petitioner Nos.2 & 4 of this writ petition filed Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 before the Sub-Collector cum Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paralakhemundi, Gajapati against the petitioners in this writ petition arraying them as O.Ps praying for directing the O.P. Nos.3 & 4 to vacate the house situated on plot No.1433/4139 Ac0.040 decimals under Khata No.215/1063 at Sai Nagar in Mouza Paralakhemundi, to direct the O.Ps to pay them monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- and to pass such other orders in their favour as the Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice stating in their complaint petition that, they (petitioners in Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 and O.Ps in this writ petition) are old and senior citizens and they are the parents of the O.P. Nos.1 & 3 and parent-in-laws of O.P. Nos.2 & 4.

The house situated on plot No.1433/4139 under Khata No.215/1063 in Mouza Paralakhemundi exclusively belong to the O.P. No.2 (mother of the petitioner Nos.1 & 3 and mother-in-law of the petitioner Nos.2 & 4). The O.P. Nos.1 & 2 are staying separately from them since last 25 years. When the O.P. No.1 was infected with Corona, then the petitioner Nos.3 & 4 stayed separately from them without taking any care and two years thereafter, they petitioner Nos.3 & 4 entered into the house of the O.P. No.2 situated on plot No.1433/4139 with a malafide intention to drive both the O.Ps in this writ petition out forcefully from that house and started torturing them (O.Ps) physically and mentally. So, they (O.Ps) apprehended danger to their lives by the attack of the petitioner Nos.3 & 4 in this writ petition. The O.P. Nos.1 & 2 did not take any step to prevent the O.Ps from the attack and assault of the petitioner Nos.3 & 4.

For which, without getting any way, they (O.Ps in this writ petition) approached the learned Tribunal by filing Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 being the complainants against the petitioners in this writ petition as per the provisions of The MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT , 2007 praying for directing them (O.Ps) to vacate the house situated on Plot No.1433/4139 immediately and to restrain them (O.Ps) from entering into the same in future, to pass an order for granting monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- to them (complainants) and to pass such other order/orders as the Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.

3. Having been noticed from the learned Tribunal in Complaint Case No.01 of 2023, the O.Ps (petitioners in this writ petition) objected to the same by filing their joint objection taking their stands that, the complainant No.1 (father of O.P. Nos.1 & 3) is a retired S.I. of police and he is a pension holder. The O.P. No.1 in that Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 (petitioner No.1 in this writ petition) being the eldest son of the complainants took all the burden of the family and looked after the welfare of the family and he has funded sufficiently not only for the marriage of his sisters, but also for establishing his younger brothers and soon after the retirement of the complainant No.1, he had undergone treatment with bypass surgery and for such

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top