IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA, J.
Sudhir Ranjan Mohapatro and Others - Petitioners
Versus
Kameswar Mohapatro and Another - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No.20992 of 2025
Decided On : 19-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court’s reasoning on statutory rights of senior citizens (Para 8 , 12 , 19) |
| 3. arguments against eviction ruling (Para 10 , 11 , 20) |
| 4. interpretation of beneficial statutes (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. unsuccessful challenge to eviction order (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
A.C. Behera, J.
This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing the final order dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure-7) passed in Misc. Appeal No.03 of 2024 by the Collector, Gajapati.
2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioners for filing of the same is that, the O.Ps of this writ petition being the old father and mother of the petitioner Nos.1 & 3 and old father-in-law and mother-in-law of the petitioner Nos.2 & 4 of this writ petition filed Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 before the Sub-Collector cum Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Paralakhemundi, Gajapati against the petitioners in this writ petition arraying them as O.Ps praying for directing the O.P. Nos.3 & 4 to vacate the house situated on plot No.1433/4139 Ac0.040 decimals under Khata No.215/1063 at Sai Nagar in Mouza Paralakhemundi, to direct the O.Ps to pay them monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- and to pass such other orders in their favour as the Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice stating in their complaint petition that, they (petitioners in Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 and O.Ps in this writ petition) are old and senior citizens and they are the parents of the O.P. Nos.1 & 3 and parent-in-laws of O.P. Nos.2 & 4.
The house situated on plot No.1433/4139 under Khata No.215/1063 in Mouza Paralakhemundi exclusively belong to the O.P. No.2 (mother of the petitioner Nos.1 & 3 and mother-in-law of the petitioner Nos.2 & 4). The O.P. Nos.1 & 2 are staying separately from them since last 25 years. When the O.P. No.1 was infected with Corona, then the petitioner Nos.3 & 4 stayed separately from them without taking any care and two years thereafter, they petitioner Nos.3 & 4 entered into the house of the O.P. No.2 situated on plot No.1433/4139 with a malafide intention to drive both the O.Ps in this writ petition out forcefully from that house and started torturing them (O.Ps) physically and mentally. So, they (O.Ps) apprehended danger to their lives by the attack of the petitioner Nos.3 & 4 in this writ petition. The O.P. Nos.1 & 2 did not take any step to prevent the O.Ps from the attack and assault of the petitioner Nos.3 & 4.
For which, without getting any way, they (O.Ps in this writ petition) approached the learned Tribunal by filing Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 being the complainants against the petitioners in this writ petition as per the provisions of The MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT , 2007 praying for directing them (O.Ps) to vacate the house situated on Plot No.1433/4139 immediately and to restrain them (O.Ps) from entering into the same in future, to pass an order for granting monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- to them (complainants) and to pass such other order/orders as the Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice.
3. Having been noticed from the learned Tribunal in Complaint Case No.01 of 2023, the O.Ps (petitioners in this writ petition) objected to the same by filing their joint objection taking their stands that, the complainant No.1 (father of O.P. Nos.1 & 3) is a retired S.I. of police and he is a pension holder. The O.P. No.1 in that Complaint Case No.01 of 2023 (petitioner No.1 in this writ petition) being the eldest son of the complainants took all the burden of the family and looked after the welfare of the family and he has funded sufficiently not only for the marriage of his sisters, but also for establishing his younger brothers and soon after the retirement of the complainant No.1, he had undergone treatment with bypass surgery and for such
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 permits eviction of children from self-acquired property of parents when allegations of abuse justify such action to ensure their ....
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act permits eviction of children from parental property if their presence poses a threat to the safety and dignity of senior citizens, refle....
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act enables eviction of children from a parent's self-acquired property when there are credible allegations of harassment, emphasizing the p....
The Senior Citizens Act empowers the Tribunal to issue eviction orders to protect the rights and welfare of senior citizens, emphasizing the obligation of children to maintain their parents, includin....
The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 protects the rights of senior citizens to maintain possession of their property independent of their children's claims.
Tribunal under Senior Citizens Act may order child's eviction from parent's property sans monetary maintenance claim if essential for senior citizen's residence and normal life, particularly after fo....
The court affirmed the authority of the Tribunal under the Senior Citizens Act to order eviction for the protection of senior citizens, rejecting claims of joint ownership and family settlement.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.