SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 632

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PRAKASH CHANDRA PANIGRAHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODDISHA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.

1. The petitioner in the present Writ Petition assails the order of demolition passed by the Rourkela Development Authority vide letter No.2227 dated 02.08.2019, asserting that it was passed without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:

2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case are as follows:

(i) The petitioner purchased a piece of land measuring Ac. 0.122 decimals, appertaining to Plot No. 184 under Khata No. 32, from Bankim Chandra Mohanty and Subrat Mohanty vide Registered Sale Deed No. 370 dated 06.04.2004.

(ii) After purchase of the said land, the petitioner applied for mutation before the Tahasildar, Rourkela, which was registered as Mutation Case No. 345 of 2004. The land was mutated in favour of the petitioner and the Record of Rights was issued accordingly.

(iii) For the purpose of his business, the petitioner submitted a building plan before the Rourkela Development Authority, after depositing the requisite scrutiny fees amounting to Rs. 16,575/- on 18.05.2012.

(iv) Thereafter, the petitioner commenced construction over the said land and raised a G+3 storied structure, which remains incomplete.

(v)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top