SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 646

ORISSA HIGH COURT
KAHKASHAN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
GAYASUDDIN KHAN – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

S.K. Mishra, J.

The present common judgment arises out of two revision petitions i.e., RPFAM No.260 of 2017 preferred by the divorced Muslim woman (hereinafter referred as the Petitioner), and RPFAM No.293 of 2017 preferred by the ex- husband (hereinafter referred as the Opposite-Party), both challenging the order dated 07.10.2017 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar, in Criminal Proceeding No.121 of 2016.

2. Vide the said order dated 07.10.2017, the amount of maintenance was enhanced by the learned Court below from Rs.3000/- to Rs. 8,100/- in an application filed by the Petitioner U/s 127 of CrPC. While the Petitioner seeks enhancement of the maintenance awarded to her as being inadequate and disproportionate to the Opposite Party’s income, the Opposite Party assails the said order as excessive, unsustainable and without jurisdiction.

3. The undisputed facts, as borne out of the records, are that the marriage between the Opposite Party, who is the Petitioner in RPFAM No.293 of 2017, and the Petitioner, who is the Opposite Party in RPFAM No.293 of 2017, was solemnized on 11.04.1993 according to Muslim rites and customs. After about six months of the marriag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top