SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Shereefa Munvara – Appellant
Versus
Muhammed Kabeer – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Shri. G. Sreekumar (Chelur), Sri. K. Ravi (Pariyarath) Advocates.
For the Respondent:Shri. C.M. Kammappu Advocates.

ORDER

The order of the Family Court declining the prayer for maintenance by a divorced Muslim woman under Section 125 of Cr.P.C on the ground that the husband has discharged his obligation under personal law is the main challenge in this revision petition.

2. The 1st petitioner was the wife of the respondent. Their marriage was solemnised on 31.01.2010 as per the Muslim customary rites. The 2nd petitioner is the daughter born in the said wedlock. The respondent divorced the 1st petitioner on 03.07.2010 by pronouncing talaq. The 1st petitioner, represented by her father, and the respondent entered Ext.D1 agreement on the same day, stipulating the post-divorce rights. In the said agreement, it was recited that 1st petitioner received a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards matah and Rs.25,000/- towards maintenance during the iddat period from the respondent. It was also recited that the 1st petitioner shall not claim any future maintenance from the respondent.

3. After the execution of Ext. D1 agreement, the petitioners filed M.C.No.351/2010 before the Family Court, Palakkad, invoking Section 125 of Cr.P.C against the respondent, claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs.6,000/- and Rs.3,500/- r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top