SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 792

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C.BEHERA, J.
Rasmita Pal @ Rashmita - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha and Others - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No.13724 of 2025
Decided On : 28-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. A. Dash, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.

De-recognition of an Accredited Social Health Activist requires adherence to procedural guidelines, reflecting the authority of the Gram Sabha in appointment matters.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ petition filed to quash de-recognition from the position of Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) on grounds of detention exceeding 48 hours - The petitioner was selected as ASHA by Gram Sabha and was performing duties satisfactorily - The Superintendent-cum-Medical Officer's order for de-recognition lacked adherence to due process as per guidelines established by Mission Directorate, NHM, Odisha. (Paras 1, 11, 12)

(B) Selection and de-recognition of ASHA - The authority to appoint inherently includes the power to dismiss, but must follow proper procedures in line with the regulations set out by National Rural Health Mission, which require consultation with selecting authorities such as the Gram Sabha. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was appointed as ASHA in a village and was removed after being arrested. Following her release, despite community support and ongoing duties, she was derecognized by the Medical Officer without due process.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled the de-recognition order was unsustainable and without proper authority, allowing the petitioner to continue her role as ASHA.

Issues: Legal authority for ASHA de-recognition and adherence to procedural guidelines in such cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment emphasizes due process in de-recognition cases, asserting community authority in the appointment of ASHAs must be respected.

Result: Writ petition allowed, de-recognition order quashed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of asha appointment and challenges. (Para 1 , 2)
2. guidelines and responsibilities of ashas. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. procedures for de-recognition of ashas. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. legal authority of appointment versus de-recognition. (Para 9 , 10)
5. decision on the legality of de-recognition. (Para 11 , 12)
6. final order regarding reinstatement of the petitioner. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

Judgment :

A.C. Behera, J.

This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the impugned letter/order dated 01.05.2024 (Annexure-8) issued/passed by the Superintendent-cum-Medical Officer, Iswarpur C.H.C., Balasore (O.P. No.4).

2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioner for filing of the same is that, the petitioner is a married woman and she has completed +2 Arts. As per the guidelines of the scheme for the selection of Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHA), she (petitioner) was properly selected as ASHA for village Nayapatana (Nuapatna) of Kandagaradi G.P. under Iswarpur C.H.C. and allowed to work as ASHA of village Nuapatna by the Selecting Authority since 03.09.2021 and she (petitioner) was rendering her services to the villagers of Nuapatna as ASHA to the satisfaction of all the villagers of Nuapatna without dereliction of her duties. The inhabitants of Nuapatna were fully satisfied upon the services of the petitioner as their ASHA. During continuance of rendering services as ASHA by the petitioner, in a Criminal Case, vide Sahadevkhunta P.S. Case No.56 of 2023 under Sections 452, 326(A), 302, 417, 494, 120-B, 212 r/w 34 of the IPC, 1860 and Section 4(2) of the Poisons Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC & ST (POA) Act, 1989, she (petitioner) was arrested on dated 26.06.2023 and remanded to the jail custody. Subsequent thereto, as per the order of this Court passed on dated 24.11.2023 in CRLA No.824 of 2023, she (petitioner) was released on bail. But, when after her release on bail, she (petitioner) worked as ASHA of village Nuapatna as before, the Superintendent-cum-Medical Officer, Iswarpur C.H.C. (O.P. No.4) did not allow her to discharge her duties as ASHA of village Nuapatna on the ground of her detention in jail custody for more than 48 hours in connection with the above Sahadevkhunta P.S. Case No.56 of 2023. On dated 21.12.2023, the O.P. No.5 (A.N.M., Iswarpur C.H.C.) issued notice as per Annexure-1 inviting applications for the selection of a new ASHA for the said village Nuapatna in place of the petitioner. Then, on dated 08.01.2024, the petitioner as well as the villagers of Nayapatana (Nuapatna) submitted a representation (Annexure-2) before the O.P. No.3 (CDMO, Balasore) requesting him to allow the petitioner for discharging her duties as ASHA of village Nuapatna as before, as she (petitioner) was working as ASHA of their village without any dereliction of her duties and her performances as ASHA was satisfactory to the full satisfaction of the villagers of Nayapatana (Nuapatna).

On dated 04.01.2024 as per Annexure-3, the local Sarpanch of Kandagaradi Gram Panchayat requested O.P. No.3 (CDMO, Balasore) to allow the petitioner for her continuance of her duties as ASHA of village Nuapatna as before. Because, the villagers of Nuapatna were fully satisfied upon her services as ASHA.

Again on dated 20.01.2024, the petitioner submitted an application before the CDMO, Balasore (O.P. No.3) praying for allowing her to continue her works as ASHA of village Nuapatna.

When, the O.P. Nos.3 & 4 did not consider to the aforesaid applications of the petitioner, the villagers of Nuapatna and local Sarpanch, then the petitioner approached this Court by filing a writ petition vide W.P.(C) No.2227 of 2024 against the O.Ps praying for a direction to the O.Ps to allow her to continue her works as ASHA of village Nuapatna under Kandagaradi G.P. in Oupada Block of Balasore District.

As per final order dated 07

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top