SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 815

JASBIR SINGH, RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Didar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jasbir Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of a bunch of 21 writ petitions i.e. CWP Nos. 15528 of 2005, 4135 of 2005, 11127, 18024 of 2006, 10464, 10465, 11117, 11407, 10137, 10645, 10177, 11249, 9750, 10892, 10073, 10296, 10309, 10353, 10461, 10462 and 10463 of 2007,.

2. These writ petitions were initially being heard along with CWP No. 5065 of 2007 and other connected matters in which acquisition of land for development of Phase-II and Phase-III of Chandigarh Technology Park in the Periphery of Chandigarh is under challenge. However, during the course of hearing, it was found that in these writ petitions, there is no challenge to the acquisition of land by the respondent-Administration but a challenge has been laid to the provisions of the " Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 (hereinafter called the "Periphery Act) and declaring the same as ultra vires. In civil writ petitions i.e. CWP Nos. 10464, 10465, 11117, 11407, 10137, 10645, 10177, 11249, 9750, 10892, 10073, 10296, 10309, 10353, 10461, 10462, 10463 of 2007, even no challenge has been laid to the vires of the aforesaid Act and only a prayer has been made for quashing of the notices issued by

































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top