ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, AJAY K.MITTAL
Shubh Timb Steels Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.
1. This petition seeks declaration of provisions of Section 65(90a) and Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as ultra vires the Constitution.
2. Case set out in the petition is that the petitioner is a public limited company and owner of commercial immoveable property at Parwanoo, District Solan in the State of Himachal Pradesh. It has let out the said property to business entities. It is receiving rent @ Rs. 1,75,000/- per month as per agreement Annexure P.-1. The transaction of lease is subject to levy of stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and is governed by Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The subject matter of property and leasing are covered by field assigned to State legislature and, thus, outside the purview of the Central Legislature.
3. In the reply filed on behalf of the Union of India, stand taken is that renting of property was different from sale of goods or transfer of property or conveyance. The transaction is not covered by tax on sale of goods. Providing of service with respect to property was covered by service tax. Other similar transactions of service in relation to property were service of Mandap Keepers [Section
Asstt. Commissioner Of Urban Land Tax V. Buckingham And Carnatic Co. Limited
C. Rajagopalachari V. Corporation Of Madras
Gift Tax Officer V. D.N. Nazareth
Govt. Of Ap V. Hindustan Machine Tools Limited
Guajrat Ambuja Cement Limited V. Union Of India
Sudhir Chand Nawa V. Wealth Tax Officer
Western India Theatres Limited V. Contonment Board
India Cement Ltd. V. State Of T.N.
Shiv Dutt Rai Fateh Chand V. Union Of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.