ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, AJAY TEWARI
Munjal Showa Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
ComOf Cus. & C. Ex. (Delhi-iv), Faridabad – Respondent
Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.
1. This appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as #24;the Act#25;) has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 18-3-2008 [2008 (227) E.L.T. 330 (T)] passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as #24;the tribunal#25;), confirming the demand of custom duty with interest. The appeal under the said provision lies to this Court only on a substantial question of law. In para 6 of the appeal, following substantial questions are sought to be raised :-
#28;(a) Whether extended period of five years is available for the notice dated 3-10-2006 issued under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) when the ingredients of #28;Fraud#29; and #28;with intent to evade payment of duty#29; are absent in the said Section? (b) Whether demand raised under Section 28(1) of the Act, is not time barred in respect of Bill of Entry No. 1289 dated 22-5-2003 and two Ex-Bonds Bills of Entry Nos. 274 dated 23-6-2003 and 282 dated 26-6-2003 and consignments cleared on 27-5-2003, 23-6-2003 and 30-6-2003 respectively. (c) Whether in the state of law, rem
Aban Lloyd Chiles Offshore Ltd. V. Commissioner
Delhi Development Authority V. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd.
East India Commercial Co. Ltd. V. Collector
Golden Tools International V. Joint Director General Of Foreign Trade
Commissioner V. Parker Industries
Commissioner V. Leader Valves Ltd.
Commissioner V. Vallabh Design Products
Commissioner V. Essar Oil Ltd.
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu V. Jagannath
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.