PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Uma Nath Singh and Rajive Bhalla JJ.
Resham Singh
Versus
Union Of India
Civil Writ Petition No. 13722 of 2007,
Decided On : NOVEMBER 6, 2007
Passport - Date of Birth Correction - General Clauses Act, 1969, Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969 - Section 21 of General Clauses Act, Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969 - The court discussed the powers and jurisdiction of a Passport authority in considering an application for alteration of date of birth based on conflicting documents, emphasizing the primacy of a birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths over a matriculation certificate. The court held that unless the birth certificate is unreliable or suspicious, the Passport authority should not routinely direct the applicant to seek adjudication before a civil Court.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner applied for a correction of his date of birth in his Passport based on a birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, which differed from the date of birth in his matriculation certificate. The Passport Officer declined to make the correction and directed the petitioner to obtain a declaratory decree from a civil Court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Passport Officer erred in refusing to entertain the plea for correction of the date of birth and in directing the petitioner to seek a declaration before a civil Court. The court emphasized the primacy of the birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths and held that the Passport authority should not routinely relegate parties to civil Courts in situations of conflicting documents.
Issues: The issues involved the jurisdiction and powers of the Passport authority in considering applications for correction of date of birth, the conflicting documents of birth certificate and matriculation certificate, and the directive to obtain a declaratory decree from a civil Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the birth certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths should prevail over a matriculation certificate in determining the date of birth, unless the birth certificate is unreliable or suspicious. The Passport authority should not routinely direct parties to seek adjudication before civil Courts in situations of conflicting documents.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Passport Officer's order, and remitted the matter to the Passport Officer to consider the application for correction of the date of birth in the Passport in accordance with law.
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content or specify the key points you'd like me to analyze, and I will generate the response based on your instructions.
Rajive Bhalla, J.
1. The petitioner, prays for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 22.8.2007, passed by respondent No. 2, declining to vary/make a correction in the petitioners Passport.
2. The petitioner was issued Passport bearing No. B0886182 on 13.10.1999, valid upto 12.10.2009 showing his date of birth as 23.7.1962. The said entry was made on the basis of an entry in his matriculation certificate. The petitioner applied for permanent immigration to the United States. The US Embassy, New Delhi required the petitioner to submit an authenticated document as to his date of birth. The petitioner, applied for issuance of a birth certificate before the Registrar of Births and Deaths. On receipt of the aforementioned certificate, the petitioner realised that his date of birth, as recorded in the Births and Deaths register was 26.5.1962 and not 23.7.1962, as entered in his matriculation certificate. Consequently, the petitioner applied to the Passport Officer, Jalandhar, for a correction of the entry regarding his date of birth, in his Passport. As the authority failed to decide the application, the petitioner filed CWP No. 10448 of 2007, praying for the issuance of a direction to the Passport authority to decide his application. Vide order dated 17.7.2007, the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the Passport authority to consider and dispose of the representation dated 1.6.2007, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.
3. The Passport Officer, Jalandhar, vide order dated 22.8.2007 declined to make any correction in the Passport, on the ground that the entry, of date of birth in the Passport was based upon an entry in the matriculation certificate and, therefore, an alteration could not be affected. The petitioner was advised to approach a competent Court for declaration with respect to his date of birth.
4. Counsel for the petitioner contends that, respondents do not deny that a Passport Officer has jurisdiction to alter/vary and/or make corrections in a Passport. The instructions dated 18.4.2001, issued by the Ministry of External Affairs acknowledge this fact. It is contended that a Passport Officer cannot decline to act, upon a certificate issued by the Registrar of Births and Deaths, under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. An entry of date/place of birth is based upon an entry in the Births and Deaths register, maintained by the Registrar under the aforesaid enactment. It is, therefore, a public record and a presumption of truth attaches thereto.
5. As regards the merits of the case, it is submitted that the petitioner was a minor, when he was admitted to school by his parents. The entry, regarding his date of birth, was wrongly recorded by his parents and, therefore, the corresponding entry in the matriculation certificate is, incorrect. The petitioner applied for a Passport, assuming that the entry in the matriculation certificate was correct. However,as the birth certificate reflects his true date of birth i.e. 26.5.1962, this technical correction, should have been allowed and the petitioner should not have been relegated to seek a declaration from a civil Court.
6. Counsel for the respondents on the other hand submits that respondent No. 2, namely; the Passport authority is bound by the Act, the Rules framed thereunder and the instructions issued by the Ministry of External Affairs from time to time. As per instructions dated 18.4.2001, a Passport Officer is competent to make alterations of a technical nature only. The instructions specifically provide that where an entry is made on the basis of a supporting document issued by one competent authority i.e. school/education authority and the applicant subsequently requests for change, on the basis of a certificate issued by another competent authority i.e. a Municipal Authority, t
Kokilaben J. Panchal V/s. Regional Passport Officer, Ahmedabad
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.