SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 123

A.P.CHOWDHRI
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. The significant question raised in this petition is whether the accused loses the right to be released on bail after the expiry of the maximum period laid down in the proviso to S. 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.(hereinafter referred to as the Code) if challan is presented before the release but after the expiry of that period.

2. The petitioner was arrested under S. 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1965, for having been found in possession of 10 kgs of contraband opium, on 25/06/1993. The accused was frist produced before the Court and was remanded to custody on 30/06/1993, and challan was presented on 28/09/1993. From the above dates, it is clear that the challan was presented on the 91st day of the date of remand when the accused was first produced before the Magistrate.

3. It is settled law that period of 90 days Within the meaning of the proviso to S. 167(2) of the Code is to be counted from the day the accused is first remanded to custody, whether police custody or judicial custody, and not from the date of arrest.It may also be taken as settled that S. 10 of the General Clauses Act does not apply if the 90th day or the 60th day, as










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top