SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(P&H) 240

PREM CHAND JAIN, S.P.GOYAL, D.S.TEWATIA
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Lal – Respondent


Judgment

D.S.Tewatia, J.

1. The following question which has been referred by the Tribunal at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Jullundur, for the opinion of this court pertains to the jurisdiction of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to decide the question of penalty and the consequent imposition of penalty of Rs. 58,000 by him, vide order dated February 25, 1978, under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act :

"Whether the Tribunal has been right in law in holding that the penalty amounting to Rs. 58,000 imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner, vide order dated February 25, 1978, under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, in pursuance of a reference admittedly made under Section 274(2) on December 23, 1976, was without jurisdiction in view of the fact that Sub-section (2) of Section 274 had been omitted by Section 65 of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, with effect from April 1, 1976?"

2. Mr. Ashok Bhan, appearing for the petitioner, has canvassed that the order dated December 13, 1979, of the Tribunal holding that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to deal with the question of imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top