PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
N.K.Sud and Hemant Gupta JJ.
Khazan Chand Nathi Ram
Versus
State Of Haryana
Civil Writ Petition No. 17178 of 2003,17188 of 2003,17696 of 2003,18898 of 2003,19073 of 2003,19132 of 2003,20031 of 2003,
Decided On : MARCH 22, 2004
Repeal of HGST Act and its Impact on Pending Appeals - Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - Section 33, Section 61 - The court held that the right of appeal is a vested right and accrues to the litigant and exists as on and from the date the lis commences. The right of appeal is to be governed by the law prevailing on the date of the institution of the suit or proceeding and not by the law that prevails on the date of its decision or at the date of the filing of the appeal. The court concluded that the right of appeal vested in the petitioner under the HGST Act is saved in terms of Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act (as applicable to State of Haryana).
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 (HGST Act), filed an appeal under Section 39(5) of the HGST Act for entertaining the appeal without prior payment of tax on account of financial hardship. However, the HGST Act was repealed by the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (HVAT Act) before the appeal could be entertained. The petitioner challenged the order of the learned appellate authority, which ordered the payment of tax assessed as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal, in the present writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the right of appeal is a vested right and accrues to the litigant and exists as on and from the date the lis commences. The right of appeal is to be governed by the law prevailing on the date of the institution of the suit or proceeding and not by the law that prevails on the date of its decision or at the date of the filing of the appeal. The court concluded that the right of appeal vested in the petitioner under the HGST Act is saved in terms of Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act (as applicable to State of Haryana).
Issues: The main issue was whether the right of appeal vested in the petitioner under the HGST Act is saved after the repeal of the HGST Act by the HVAT Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the right of appeal is a vested right and accrues to the litigant and exists as on and from the date the lis commences. The right of appeal is to be governed by the law prevailing on the date of the institution of the suit or proceeding and not by the law that prevails on the date of its decision or at the date of the filing of the appeal. The court concluded that the right of appeal vested in the petitioner under the HGST Act is saved in terms of Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act (as applicable to State of Haryana).
Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed with no order as to costs. The petitioners were granted four weeks time to comply with the conditions of Section 39(5) of the HGST Act.
Hemant Gupta, J.
1. This judgment shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 17178, 17188, 17696, 18898, 19073, 19132 and 20031 of 2003, 207 and 4415 of 2004 as all these cases involve similar question of law consequent to enactment of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003, w.e.f. April 1, 2003. However, for facility of reference, the facts are being taken from Civil Writ Petition No. 17178 of 2003.
2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 (for short "the HGST Act") and is engaged in the business of purchase of paddy. For the assessment year 1998-99, the Assessing Authority framed the assessment under the HGST Act and raised an additional demand on account of purchase tax calculated under Section 6 of the HGST Act. The petitioner filed appeal along with an application under Section 39(5) of the HGST Act for entertaining the appeal without prior payment of tax on account of financial hardship on March 3, 2003. However, before the appeal filed by the petitioner could be entertained by the learned Appellate Authority, the HGST Act was repealed by virtue of Section 61(1) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short "the HVAT Act"). It was then alleged that under the HVAT Act, the appeal filed by the petitioner is required to be entertained without any condition of pre-deposit of tax assessed, therefore, the appeal filed by the petitioner is required to be heard and decided under Section 33 of the HVAT Act. No payment of tax can be insisted upon as a condition precedent for hearing of appeal but still the learned appellate authority vide order dated April 2, 2003 ordered the payment of tax assessed in six monthly instalments as a condition precedent for hearing of appeal. The said order of the learned appellate authority was challenged by the petitioner in appeal before the Haryana Tax Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal"). The learned Tribunal dismissed the appeal holding that there is no implied repeal of provisions of Section 39(5) of the HGST Act and the appeal is to be entertained only under the provisions of Section 39(5) of the HGST Act. It is the said order which is impugned in the present writ petition.
3. In the written statement, it has been pleaded that tax liability related to the period when erstwhile HGST Act was still in existence and has not been repealed. Reference was made to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa [1983] 53 STC 315 to state that where any right or liability arises under a particular Act, the remedy available under that Act has to be availed of. Reference was also made to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Manphul Singh Sharma v. Smt. Ahmedi Begum (1994) 5 JT 49 (SC) to state that when a repeal is accompanied by a fresh legislation on the same subject, the provisions of the new Act will have to be looked into to determine whether and how far the new Act projects or keeps alive the old rights and liabilities. It has been stated that the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 61 of the HVAT Act envisages the procedure regarding entertainment of pending appeals, applications, revisions or other proceedings made or preferred to any authority under the old Act and pending at the commencement of the HVAT Act. It has been pointed out that since the order of assessment has been made before coming into operation of the HVAT Act, therefore, the right of appeal is to be exercised in terms of the HGST Act. Reliance was also placed upon Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 (as applicable to the State of Haryana).
4. Before adverting to the respective contentions of the parties, it would be beneficial to reproduce the relevant provisions of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898 (as applicable to the State of Haryana) : Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 :
"Section 25. Submission of retu
Haryana Spun Pipe Construction Co. V/s. State Of Haryana
Indo Swiss Time Limited, Dundahera V/s. Umrao
Garikapati Veeraya V/s. N. Subbiah Choudhry
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur V/s. State Of Maharashtra
India Tobacco Co, Ltd. V/s. Commercial Tax Officer, Bhavnipore
Kalawati Devi Harlalka V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax, West Bengal
Vinod Gurudas Raikar V/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Vitthalbhai Naranbhai Patel V/s. Commissioner Of Sales Tax, M.P.
manphul Singh Sharma V/s. Smt. Ahmedi Begum
Gajraj Singh V/s. State Transport Appellate Tribunal
Hardeodas Jagannath V/s. State Of Assam
Hoosein Kasam Dada (India) Ltd. V/s. State Of Madhya Pradesh
Shiv Shakti Co-operative Housing Society, Nagpur V/s. Swaraj Developers
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.